This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
20160713 FMG concall
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
HL7 TSC FMG Meeting Minutes Location: |
Date: 2016-07-13 Time: 4:00 PM U.S. Eastern | |
Chair: | Note taker(s): Anne W. |
Quorum = chair + 4 | yes/no | |||||
Co chairs | x | David Hay | Lloyd McKenzie | |||
ex-officio | Woody Beeler, Dave Shaver FGB Co-chairs |
. | Wayne Kubick, CTO |
Members | Members | Members | Observers/Guests | ||||
x | Hans Buitendijk | Brian Postlethwaite | x | Paul Knapp | x | Anne W., scribe | |
x | Josh Mandel | John Moehrke | x | Brian Pech | |||
Grahame Grieve | . |
Agenda
- Roll Call
- Agenda Check
- Minutes from 20160706_FMG_concall
- Administrative
- Action items
- All: Look at CDS proposals before going to ballot
- Lloyd to update explanation on how to read the reports spreadsheet and see if he can get the emails to work properly; then send an email to the co-chairs to review/address the stale column
- David to draft message to co-chairs regarding WG intentions for FMM levels
- Grahame to write up definition of custom resources for review
- Lloyd to reach out to Bryn to add RIM scope to ActivityDefinition and PlanDefinition
- Connectathon Actions
- Hans to follow up with Genomics on Connectathon track roles and participants
- Brian Post to fill in scenarios on Provider Directories and Scheduling
- Eric to follow up to see if Vitals Profile track will go ahead
- David to build spreadsheet
- David to check to see if PATCH contains success scenarios
- Action items
- Discussion Topics
- Solicitation of feedback on open issues
- Reports
- Connectathon management (David/Brian)
- FGB –
- MnM –
- FMG Liaisons –
- Process management
- Ballot Planning
- Ballot content review and QA process FHIR QA Guidelines
- AOB (Any Other Business)
Minutes
- Roll Call
- Agenda Check
- MOTION to approve: Hans/Josh
- VOTE: all in favor
- Minutes from 20160706_FMG_concall
- MOTION to approve: Hans/Josh
- VOTE: all in favor
- Administrative
- Action items
- All: Look at CDS proposals before going to ballot
- Add for next week
- Lloyd to update explanation on how to read the reports spreadsheet and see if he can get the emails to work properly; then send an email to the co-chairs to review/address the stale column
- Add for next week
- David to draft message to co-chairs regarding WG intentions for FMM levels
- Decision to hold off - remove from actions
- Grahame to write up definition of custom resources for review
- Will review later in call
- Lloyd to reach out to Bryn to add RIM scope to ActivityDefinition and PlanDefinition
- Add for next week
- All: Look at CDS proposals before going to ballot
- Connectathon Actions
- Hans to follow up with Genomics on Connectathon track roles and participants
- Reached out and they were going to make updates. Leave on for next week.
- Brian Post to fill in scenarios on Provider Directories and Scheduling
- Add for next week
- Eric to follow up to see if Vitals Profile track will go ahead
- Add for next week
- David to build spreadsheet
- Complete
- David to check to see if PATCH contains success scenarios
- Does now contain success scenarios - complete.
- Hans to follow up with Genomics on Connectathon track roles and participants
- Action items
- Discussion Topics
- Solicitation of feedback on open issues
- Originated from discussion on Zulip FMG stream between Grahame/Lloyd. Do we want to do something like this for STU3? Zulip seems a more appropriate place for this type of feedback. Not sure why there would be a different place than Gforge and Zulip and recommend taking this page down.
- MOTION to discontinue this practice: Paul/Brian Pech
- VOTE: all in favor
- Originated from discussion on Zulip FMG stream between Grahame/Lloyd. Do we want to do something like this for STU3? Zulip seems a more appropriate place for this type of feedback. Not sure why there would be a different place than Gforge and Zulip and recommend taking this page down.
- Solicitation of feedback on open issues
- Reports
- Connectathon management (David/Brian)
- No updates. Do we want to have tables for streams? Paul: Payers want adjacent tables so they can congregate in a herd and communicate more efficiently. David: We would then need more concrete info on what tracks people want to participate in. Brian Pech: Chatter about large numbers coming because of Baltimore location. Do we have a handle on that? David: Has heard similar but nothing concrete yet. Registration is now open. Discussion over how to capture track preference information.
- ACTION: David will contact Mary Ann to discuss details
- ACTION: David will draft email to attendees regarding track preference signup
- No updates. Do we want to have tables for streams? Paul: Payers want adjacent tables so they can congregate in a herd and communicate more efficiently. David: We would then need more concrete info on what tracks people want to participate in. Brian Pech: Chatter about large numbers coming because of Baltimore location. Do we have a handle on that? David: Has heard similar but nothing concrete yet. Registration is now open. Discussion over how to capture track preference information.
- FGB –
- Cancelled this week
- Connectathon management (David/Brian)
- Adjourned at 4:30 pm Eastern
Next Steps
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date) | |||
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
Back to FHIR_Management_Group
© 2016 Health Level Seven® International