2016-07-01 PC CIMI POC Call Minutes

Back to PC CIMI POC Minutes

Minutes Template

Meeting Information

HL7 PC-CIMI-POC Meeting Minutes Location: HL7 WGM, Montreal		Date: 2016-07-01 Time: 9:00-10:30 ET
Facilitator	Jay Lyle	Note taker(s)	Jay Lyle
Attendee	Name	Affiliation
y	Richard Esmond	PenRad
y	Galen Mulrooney	JP Systems
y	Jay Lyle	JP Systems / VA
	Harold Solbrig	Mayo
y	Susan Matney	Intermountain
y	Joey Coyle	Intermountain
	Laura Heerman Langford	Intermountain
y	M'Lynda Owens	Intermountain
y	Stephen Hufnagel	Intermountain

Agenda

Agenda Topics

1. . Semantic binding: Three concepts (model, code, observable), Five candidate slots.
2. . root bound to "observable," to "observable descendants," or left to node model?
3. . Observable model gaps (e.g., "technique" vs "procedure")
4. . ADL style

Minutes

Minutes/Conclusions Reached:

1. The three bindings in play are distinct
   1. the observable concept
   2. the thing represented by the LOINC code
   3. the entire model
2. The entire model is represented by the archetype id
   1. This makes a root node model binding unnecessary
   2. Though a question remains: what identifier or code is used to recognize isosemantic models? Perhaps a root node binding would be useful for that purpose.
3. The "code" element (in an observation) is where a LOINC code goes
   1. "Code" is a type, so it's not very descriptive. Perhaps this could be renamed to something expressing "observed concept that might contain properties outside the observable model"
4. We need a place to put an "observable entity" concept.
   1. Not the "code" model binding -- that should mean "code." Ditto "result" model binding.
   2. A new node: "Observable Result"
      1. A structure node that may have children
      2. Children have model bindings to SCT Observable model
      3. A different name might be good.
         1. It's not the result, it's the thing the result describes
         2. "Observable Result" is the name of a pattern archetype
5. We'll bring this proposal to the general CIMI meeting.
   1. Loose end: if the LOINC code does completely express the observable, do we need to repeat it?

Meeting Outcomes

Actions begin construction of test classes

Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items Review test class progress & tooling

© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.