This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
2016-06-17 PC CIMI POC Call Minutes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Back to PC CIMI POC Minutes
Minutes Template
Meeting Information
HL7 PC-CIMI-POC Meeting Minutes Location: HL7 WGM, Montreal |
Date: 2016-06-17 Time: 9:00-10:30 ET | ||
Facilitator | Jay Lyle | Note taker(s) | Jay Lyle |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation
| |
y | Richard Esmond | PenRad | |
Galen Mulrooney | JP Systems | ||
y | Jay Lyle | JP Systems / VA | |
y | Harold Solbrig | Mayo | |
y | Susan Matney | Intermountain | |
y | Joey Coyle | Intermountain | |
Laura Heerman Langford | Intermountain | ||
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- . Semantic binding: Three concepts (model, code, observable), Five candidate slots.
- . root bound to "observable," to "observable descendants," or left to node model?
- . Observable model gaps (e.g., "technique" vs "procedure")
- . ADL style
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
- The three bindings in play are distinct
- the observable concept
- the thing represented by the LOINC code
- the entire model
- The entire model is represented by the archetype id
- This makes a root node model binding unnecessary
- Though a question remains: what identifier or code is used to recognize isosemantic models? Perhaps a root node binding would be useful for that purpose.
- The "code" element (in an observation) is where a LOINC code goes
- "Code" is a type, so it's not very descriptive. Perhaps this could be renamed to something expressing "observed concept that might contain properties outside the observable model"
- We need a place to put an "observable entity" concept.
- Not the "code" model binding -- that should mean "code." Ditto "result" model binding.
- A new node: "Observable Result"
- A structure node that may have children
- Children have model bindings to SCT Observable model
- A different name might be good.
- It's not the result, it's the thing the result describes
- "Observable Result" is the name of a pattern archetype
- We'll bring this proposal to the general CIMI meeting.
- Loose end: if the LOINC code does completely express the observable, do we need to repeat it?
Meeting Outcomes
Actions
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.