This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
20180320 US Realm SC Call
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
back to US_Realm_Steering_Committee
back to US_Realm_Steering_Committee_Conference_Calls
| US Realm Steering Committee Call Agenda/Minutes |
Date: 2018-03-20 Time: 1 PM Eastern | ||
| Co-Chairs | Ed/Brett | Note taker(s) | Anne |
| Attendee / Name | |||||
| Calvin Beebe | Keith Boone | Hans Buitendijk | |||
| Lorraine Constable | Johnathan Coleman | Regrets | Ed Hammond | ||
| Tony Julian | Paul Knapp | Austin Kreisler | |||
| Brett Marquard | Ken McCaslin | Nancy Orvis | |||
| Brian Pech | Wayne Kubick | Christol Green | |||
| Sandra Stuart | . | Pat Van Dyke | . | Craig Parker | |
| Danielle Friend | . | Eric Haas | . | Jenni Syed | |
| Steve Posnak | . | David Susanto | . | John Roberts | |
| Visitor/ Name | |||||
| Quorum: Chair + 7 | |||||
Agenda
Administrivia
- Agenda review
- Review notes from 20180227_US_Realm_SC_Call
- Review Items
- Common Clinical Registry Framework: Core Data Elements for Registry Interoperability PSS
- Group reviews. Question about what product family this will be; will likely be cross-paradigm. This will be a DAM with an information model for the elements which are used across registries. For example, if two registries discovered that they had different formats or data models, one could change to match the other to share data. Eric feels there are too many similarities to structured data capture. Brett: If we've already done the modeling for exchange, that should be absorbed into the DAM. Doesn't mention anything about the prior work that's been done already. Hans: It could point to existing IGs. Part of the scope is converting to CIMI models. Brett looks into their materials and they are referencing previous work. Brett thinks there should be a reference to reviewing US Core.
- MOTION to approve with the following update: In scope section, add a reference to US Core and reference to where additional data element requirements will be sourced. Copy into Scope: ONC, the Medical Device Epidemiology Network, an FDA public-private partnership (MDEpiNet), US Core and FHIR: Hans/Calvin
- VOTE: Eric votes against. Remaining in favor.
- Group reviews. Question about what product family this will be; will likely be cross-paradigm. This will be a DAM with an information model for the elements which are used across registries. For example, if two registries discovered that they had different formats or data models, one could change to match the other to share data. Eric feels there are too many similarities to structured data capture. Brett: If we've already done the modeling for exchange, that should be absorbed into the DAM. Doesn't mention anything about the prior work that's been done already. Hans: It could point to existing IGs. Part of the scope is converting to CIMI models. Brett looks into their materials and they are referencing previous work. Brett thinks there should be a reference to reviewing US Core.
- Common Clinical Registry Framework: Core Data Elements for Registry Interoperability PSS
Discussion:
- Review of any outstanding issues
Minutes
Meeting Outcomes
| Actions
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
© 2018 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved
