This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Conference call minutes 9 February 2016
Revision as of 07:46, 10 February 2016 by Michael tan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "=Health Concern Topic= '''Patient Care WG''' '''February 9nd 2016''' ==Attendees:== *Michael Tan – Chair *David Pyke *Dan Russell *Hank Mayers *David Tao *Russell McDonell ...")
Health Concern Topic
Patient Care WG
February 9nd 2016
Attendees:
- Michael Tan – Chair
- David Pyke
- Dan Russell
- Hank Mayers
- David Tao
- Russell McDonell
- Lawrence McKnight
Participation Information
Phone Number: +1 770-657-9270
Participant Passcode: 943377
Web Meeting Info www.webex.com Meeting number 238 558 505
Minutes 2 February
- Motion to approve the minutes by Hank Mayers, second by David Tao.
- 1 abstention, 0 against, 5 approve.
DAM
- Hank has submitted a table for chapter 4 of the DAM.
- This has to be integrated by David Pyke, but David is not on the call.
- In the previous call the group decided to gray out the allergy and problem list.
- The list would then have to be part of another scope of a DAM. There is no such DAM.
- FHIR does have a resource called "list".
- Discussion arises whether the list should be in the scope of the DAM.
- If the output lists need characteristics of health concerns that are required from the viewpoint of functionality, then we should consider of making it part of the DAM.
- Examples of such a functionality could be "list purpose" or "list kind".
- In older versions of the health concern model we had various kinds of lists.
- The allergy and problem list in the diagram of the September 2015 ballot were put there as the most important examples of output.
- Suggestion to make the lists more abstract and call it "concern lists".
- We have to think of the appropriate attributes of the concern lists.
- Examples of characteristics of the concern lists are "reconciled" or "unreconciled" lists.
- Jay will make a proposal. Action Jay
- There were many remarks about the health concern event. A health concern has relationship with all types of events. Readers find this too abstract.
- The older versions of the model had different classes such as observations, risks as related classes, but readers always found a class that was missing.
- Jay suggests to introduce a intermediate level according to the SOAP model to make it less abstract.
- This has also the risk that this leads to comments that certain elements will be missing.
- A suggestion is to split into 2 figures, where the health concern event is drawn in a separate picture with the different SOAP type of elements. Action Jay
Action items
- Propose text about priorities between health concerns: David
- Submit the NIB: Michael
- Change allergy and problem lists to concern lists: jay
- Proposal for alternative model diagram with SOAP elements related to the health concern: Jay.
Go back to health concern minutes[[1]]