Arden Syntax:Implementation Guide:Comparision to Others

go up

Arden Syntax related to other formalism or artifacts

External to HL7

Asbru

• Sources of information: [1] [2] [3]
• Is it in practical use?: Unknown. There are prototype applications in diabetes, jaundice and breast cancer. [4]
• Are there implementations?: Yes. [5]
• Activ?: Latest publication is from 2009.
• Standard?: No. Developed by the Vienna University of Technology and Stanford Medical Informatics.
• Links:
• Should we compare Arden to it?:

Gaston

• Sources: [6] [7]
• Is it in practical use?: Unknown. There might be an implementation running on a hospital in the Netherlands. [8]
• Are there implementations?: Yes. [9]
• Active?: Latest publication is from 2004.
• Standard?: No. Developed by Eindhoven University of Technology; Maastricht University; Medecs BV, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
• Links:
• Should we compare Arden to it?:

DeGel

• Is it in practical use?: Unknown.
• Are there implementations?: Yes. [10]
• Active?: Latest publication is from 2013.
• Standard?: No. Developed by Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel.
• Links:
• Should we compare Arden to it?:

EON

• Is it in practical use?: Unknown. There was a trial at VA [11] [12].
• Are there implementations?: Unknown.
• Active?: No.
• Standard?: No. Developed by Stanford Medical Informatics.
• Links:
• Should we compare Arden to it?:

GLARE

• Is it in practical use?: Unknown. No sources found.
• Are there implementations?: Unknown.
• Active?: Latest publication is from 2012.
• Standard?: No.
• Links:
• Should we compare Arden to it?:

GLIF

• Is it in practical use?:
• Are there implementations?:
• Active?: Latest publication is from
• Standard?:
• Links:
• Should we compare Arden to it?: Yes.

GUIDE

• Is it in practical use?: No.
• Are there implementations?: Unknown. [13]
• Active?: Latest publication is from
• Standard?: No.
• Links:
• Should we compare Arden to it?:

HELEN

• Is it in practical use?: No.
• Are there implementations?: Yes. [14]
• Active?: Latest publication is from 2005.
• Standard?: No.
• Links:
• Should we compare Arden to it?:

PROforma

• Is it in practical use?: Yes. [15] [16]
• Are there implementations?: Yes.
• Active?: Yes.
• Standard?: No.
• Links: [17]
• Should we compare Arden to it?: Yes.

PRODIGY

• Is it in practical use?: Yes. UK only.
• Are there implementations?: Yes. [18]
• Active?: Discontinued.
• Standard?: No.
• Links:
• Should we compare Arden to it?: No.

SAGE

• Is it in practical use?: Unknown. There were some prototypes.
• Are there implementations?: Yes [19].
• Active?: Unknown.
• Standard?: No.
• Links: [20]
• Should we compare Arden to it?:

SEBASTIAN

• Is it in practical use?: Unknown.
• Are there implementations?: Yes.
• Active?: Unknown.
• Standard?: Uses standards.
• Links:
• Should we compare Arden to it?: Yes.