This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "Conference call minutes 26 March 2015"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "=Health Concern Topic= '''Patient Care WG''' '''March 26, 2015 ''' ==Attendees:== *Michael Tan – Chair *Jay Lyle *Ray Simkus *Ken Chen *Kevin Coonan *Laura Heermann Langfor...")
 
Line 24: Line 24:
 
Move:  Jay/Ken No – 0, Abstain – 0 Approve – 4
 
Move:  Jay/Ken No – 0, Abstain – 0 Approve – 4
  
−
==Review of January 2015 diagram==
+
==Review of new diagram==
−
Diagram discussion:  The original diagram had a health concern list pointing to a problem list and allergy list.  Changed the health concern list to a health concern list item. The group discussed if the list item was necessary and determined that the problem list and the allergy list could be related directly to the health concern (E.G. health concern collects problem list, health concern collects allergy list).
+
Jay had adjusted the Diagram, but also has new questions. This document was sent previous to the meeting.
 +
There were no remarks about the new model.
  
−
*Decision – remove the “health concern list item”
+
Jay has added an example of John Doe to illustrate the process.
−
*Decision – call the “health concern list owner”, the “list author”.
+
Kevin proposes to set up business rules of how the mechanism should work.  
−
*Decision – what is the relationship of the “list author” to the problem list and the allergy list?  Is the verb “own”? 
+
However a DAM should restrict itself to the functional requirements and not provide the informational solutions at this stage.
−
*Agreed on the word “compile” instead of "defines".
 
  
−
Adjusting comments and disposition will then publish.  
+
Kevin suggests that a table with concerns and problems could give more insight of how this should work. Kevin will provide an example.
  
 +
We discussed the first question on the relationship between concerns, orders and plans. The answer is that both could be true.
 +
 +
We will continue with the remaining questions in the next call.
  
  
 
Go back to health concern minutes:
 
Go back to health concern minutes:
 
[[http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Health_Concern_Meetings/Conference_Calls_Agenda_and_Minutes]]
 
[[http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Health_Concern_Meetings/Conference_Calls_Agenda_and_Minutes]]

Revision as of 10:43, 27 March 2015

Health Concern Topic

Patient Care WG

March 26, 2015

Attendees:

  • Michael Tan – Chair
  • Jay Lyle
  • Ray Simkus
  • Ken Chen
  • Kevin Coonan
  • Laura Heermann Langford

Participation Information Phone Number: +1 770-657-9270 Participant Passcode: 943377

Web Meeting Info www.webex.com Meeting number 230 634 425

Previous Meeting

Minutes from March 16 th, 2015 Move: Jay/Ken No – 0, Abstain – 0 Approve – 4

Review of new diagram

Jay had adjusted the Diagram, but also has new questions. This document was sent previous to the meeting. There were no remarks about the new model.

Jay has added an example of John Doe to illustrate the process. Kevin proposes to set up business rules of how the mechanism should work. However a DAM should restrict itself to the functional requirements and not provide the informational solutions at this stage.

Kevin suggests that a table with concerns and problems could give more insight of how this should work. Kevin will provide an example.

We discussed the first question on the relationship between concerns, orders and plans. The answer is that both could be true.

We will continue with the remaining questions in the next call.


Go back to health concern minutes: [[1]]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.hl7.org/w/index.php?title=Conference_call_minutes_26_March_2015&oldid=98309"