This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "/Language and Serialization"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This page contains discussion about language and serialization. | This page contains discussion about language and serialization. | ||
− | Where we'll have a particular challenge is where the RDF and OWL representations can both be expressed using the same sytnax. It may be that the solution there is to return both the instance and class information. Is there a distinct mime-type for JSON-LD from regular JSON? | + | Lloyd McKenzie: Where we'll have a particular challenge is where the RDF and OWL representations can both be expressed using the same sytnax. It may be that the solution there is to return both the instance and class information. Is there a distinct mime-type for JSON-LD from regular JSON? |
− | + | Tony:RDF, RDFS and OWL can all be expressed in RDF/XML. I am using it all the time out of Protégé. | |
− | |||
− | RDF, RDFS and OWL can all be expressed in RDF/XML. I am using it all the time out of Protégé. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
Here is a document comparing some of the [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=File:Comparison_of_Semantic_Web_serialization_syntaxes.pdf syntaxes supported by Protégé ] | Here is a document comparing some of the [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=File:Comparison_of_Semantic_Web_serialization_syntaxes.pdf syntaxes supported by Protégé ] |
Latest revision as of 15:58, 7 March 2015
This page contains discussion about language and serialization.
Lloyd McKenzie: Where we'll have a particular challenge is where the RDF and OWL representations can both be expressed using the same sytnax. It may be that the solution there is to return both the instance and class information. Is there a distinct mime-type for JSON-LD from regular JSON?
Tony:RDF, RDFS and OWL can all be expressed in RDF/XML. I am using it all the time out of Protégé.
Here is a document comparing some of the syntaxes supported by Protégé