Difference between revisions of "Conference call minutes 5 March 2015"
Michael tan (talk | contribs) |
Michael tan (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
==Ballot reconciliation== | ==Ballot reconciliation== | ||
− | The ballot comments on comments 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 en 27 have been discussed in a previous conference call, but could not approved due to lack of quorum. In this session we do have a quorum and therefore a motion was moved by Larry to approve the dispositions of these comment lines. IT seconded by Jay. '''Votes: 2 approve, 0 against, 2 abstain. | + | The ballot comments on comments 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 en 27 have been discussed in a previous conference call, but could not approved due to lack of quorum. In this session we do have a quorum and therefore a motion was moved by Larry to approve the dispositions of these comment lines. IT seconded by Jay. |
− | ''' | + | |
+ | '''Votes: 2 approve, 0 against, 2 abstain.''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | A copy of the ballot reconciliation spreadsheet can be found here [[File:Total Reconciliationspreadsheet.xslx]] | ||
==Review of January 2015 diagram== | ==Review of January 2015 diagram== |
Revision as of 08:34, 6 March 2015
Contents
Health Concern Topic
Patient Care WG
March 5, 2015
Attendees:
- Michael Tan – Chair
- Jay Lyle
- Stephen Chu
- Ken Chen
- Larry McKnight
Participation Information
Phone Number: +1 770-657-9270
Participant Passcode: 943377
Web Meeting Info www.webex.com Meeting number 239 836 807
Ballot reconciliation
The ballot comments on comments 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 en 27 have been discussed in a previous conference call, but could not approved due to lack of quorum. In this session we do have a quorum and therefore a motion was moved by Larry to approve the dispositions of these comment lines. IT seconded by Jay.
Votes: 2 approve, 0 against, 2 abstain.
A copy of the ballot reconciliation spreadsheet can be found here File:Total Reconciliationspreadsheet.xslx
Review of January 2015 diagram
- We discussed the model which was developed in San Antonio:
- A problem or an allergy is not automatically a concern to a care provider or patient. This very much depends on the specialization and interest of the concerned person. An example is an anorexia patient that does not regard her weight as a problem, but care provider and family do.
- an allergy has a different informational structure than a problem and an allergy list is therefore different than a problem list, as it is displaying an allergen to which the patient is allergic.
- a debate aroused about the distinction between a concern list and problem or allergy list.
- in Larry's view most EMR, PHR only register problems or allergies. It is the selection of these problems by a (concerned) viewer that makes it a concern to a care provider or patient.
- a concern list can be seen as an virtual view of a list of problems or allergies.
We decide to remove the health concern list. Jay will redraw the diagram and the new diagram will be discussed in the next call.
The document of the old model can be found here. [[1]]
Go back to health concern minutes:
[[2]]