Revision as of 08:01, 31 October 2014

Health Concern Topic

Patient Care WG October 30, 2014

a. Review UML model

We reviewed the comments from row 7 onwards and looked at the impact for the model.
Graham asks whether concerns should have a classification of the type of concern, such as chronic, acute, episodic concerns. This requirement has not been expressed so far in the use cases.
Another issue brought forward is a method to prioritize health issues. It is not clear whether the priority should be expressed in the concerns or in the related elements such as care plans/
During the session we ran thru the comments once more.
row 4: We recognize that different actors ( users) have different rights, such as viewing, updating and creating concerns.
row 7: We have removed the current Health Concern Name. This information can retrieved by looking at the most recent Health Concern name.
We have added the element Provider to the diagram.

none

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 ===Model review:===
-*There were many comments regarding the model on page 18 of  the DAM
+*We reviewed the comments from  row 7 onwards and looked at the impact for the model.
-*for example line 5,7,13,27.28,30,32,33,34 of the ballot spreadsheet.
+*Graham asks whether concerns should have a classification of the type of concern, such as chronic, acute, episodic concerns. This requirement has not been expressed so far in the use cases.
-*Jay has gone thru the rows and looked if they had impact on the model.
+*Another issue brought forward is a method to prioritize health issues. It is not clear whether the priority should be expressed in the concerns or in the related elements such as care plans/
 *During the session we ran thru the comments once more.
 *row 4: We recognize that different actors ( users) have different rights, such as viewing, updating and creating concerns.