This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "August 12, 2014 CBCC Conference Call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
* 151 voters in the Data Provenance poll | * 151 voters in the Data Provenance poll | ||
− | '''Patient Friendly Natural Language PSS''' | + | '''Patient Friendly Natural Language PSS - presentation by Suzanne and David''' |
+ | * Aim is to get something that security and privacy can use to translate consent directives. One of the general issues is that patient language is not always standardized. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Comment from Serafina: “Yeah, sure” won’t always work. It could be transformed into affirmative, but what also has to be standardized is, you said, “Is it okay if Dr. So-and-So looks at your lab work?” What do you mean “looks at your lab work?” I think what you do has to be more standardized and understandable because I’m not sure that if you tell the patient “Is it okay for me to look at your lab work?” they will understand that it means that another person is going to get that lab work, and what they are going to do with the work that they have. That’s what also has to be standardized, doesn’t it? | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Additional comment from Serafina: My concern is that you can’t ask the questions unless the patient understands what the questions are about. I think that the process has to help inform people on what’s the standard. It’s the means of actually educating people about the scope, the environment. | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Comment from Kathleen: Do we have a facilitator walking us through to actually create the FHIR resource? I’d really like to get a timeline and milestones for that. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Privacy Consent Directives ballot reconciliation update''' | ||
+ | * | ||
Meeting Adjourned at 10:46 PST | Meeting Adjourned at 10:46 PST |
Revision as of 17:12, 14 August 2014
Contents
Community-Based Collaborative Care Working Group Meeting
Meeting Information
Attendees
x | Member Name | x | Member Name | x | Member Name | x | Member Name | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x | Johnathan ColemanCBCC Interim Co-Chair | x | Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-Chair | x | Jim KretzCBCC Interim Co-Chair | . | Max WalkerCBCC Co-Chair | ||||
. | Wende Baker | . | Bill Braithwaite, MD | x | Kathleen Connor | . | Daniel Crough | ||||
. | Steve Eichner | x | Rick Grow | . | Mohammed Jafari | . | Tracy Leeper | ||||
. | Lisa Nelson | x | Mike Lardiere | x | Diana Proud-Madruga | . | Harry Rhodes | ||||
. | Lori Simon | . | Ioana Singureanu | . | Tony Weida | . | Brian Newton (Healthwise San Francisco), invited by Mike Ladariere | ||||
. | Maryann Juurlink | . | Steve Daviss | . | Kate Wetherby | x | Neelima Chennamaraja | ||||
. | Dina Passman | x | Serafina Versaggi | . | Marlowe Greenberg | . | Chris Clark, WV | ||||
. | Ken Ortbals | . | Matt Peeling | x | Tim McKay | . | . | ||||
. | Hady Khorasani | x | David Henkel | . | Amanda Nash | . | _Bob Yencha | ||||
. | Julia Chan, Pharmacist | . | _ | . | _ | . | _ |
Agenda
- (05 min) Roll Call, Approve [June 29, 20
- (15 min) Data Provenance Update
- (10 min) PSS Patient Friendly Natural Language
- (05 min;;) Privacy Consent Directives - Ballot Reconciliation
Meeting Minutes
Motion to approve Meeting Minutes for August 5 (Johnathan/Kathleen) Objections: none ; Abstentions: none; Unanimous approval
Data Provenance Update
- Ballot is open, voting has started HL7 Ballot Schedule Countdown
- Johnathan recognized the great effort and job well done
- 151 voters in the Data Provenance poll
Patient Friendly Natural Language PSS - presentation by Suzanne and David
- Aim is to get something that security and privacy can use to translate consent directives. One of the general issues is that patient language is not always standardized.
- Comment from Serafina: “Yeah, sure” won’t always work. It could be transformed into affirmative, but what also has to be standardized is, you said, “Is it okay if Dr. So-and-So looks at your lab work?” What do you mean “looks at your lab work?” I think what you do has to be more standardized and understandable because I’m not sure that if you tell the patient “Is it okay for me to look at your lab work?” they will understand that it means that another person is going to get that lab work, and what they are going to do with the work that they have. That’s what also has to be standardized, doesn’t it?
- Additional comment from Serafina: My concern is that you can’t ask the questions unless the patient understands what the questions are about. I think that the process has to help inform people on what’s the standard. It’s the means of actually educating people about the scope, the environment.
- Comment from Kathleen: Do we have a facilitator walking us through to actually create the FHIR resource? I’d really like to get a timeline and milestones for that.
Privacy Consent Directives ballot reconciliation update
Meeting Adjourned at 10:46 PST