Difference between revisions of "Value Set Definition Standard Project"
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
## We will allow the use of slightly more complex datatypes (DSET and EN are currently used) [Example content attribute was discussed when this decision was reached] | ## We will allow the use of slightly more complex datatypes (DSET and EN are currently used) [Example content attribute was discussed when this decision was reached] | ||
− | Latest (v23) version of doc [https://www.dropbox.com/s/ | + | Latest (v23) version of doc [https://www.dropbox.com/s/c7x77xnzr9z0vtv/VSDspec_draft23.docx here]. |
---- | ---- |
Revision as of 18:33, 6 May 2014
A New Normative Standard for Value Set Definitions
Contents
Overview
[From the PSS] Describe the elements that make up a “Value Set Definition”, and ballot this as a normative HL7 specification, including a demonstration of how this is met in FHIR profiles and HL7 Model Interchange Format (MIF).
The definition of value sets is a required activity in completing the specification of most health information technology artefacts. To date, the approach for doing so has not been consistent within HL7 constructs and elsewhere. Many of the required elements and approaches are embedded in existing HL7 artefacts but not consistently. Currently, an explicit list of all the fields in an HL7 value set definition are surfaced only in the informative balloted MIF, with a general description of them in the normative Core Principles specification. A more accessible and standardized list of these fields is required to facilitate interoperability and sharing of value set definitions across HL7 artefacts and the Health IT community at large.
Success criteria: Publishing of the normative standard, and a demonstration of value set definitions that conform to this published normative specification.
Project Processes
This project is using DropBox as a collaborative document sharing process during the formative draft development process. If you are interested in viewing the current draft please attend the meetings. If you are interested in participating in the editing and review of the drafts, please send a request to get access to the dropbox folder to Rob McClure ( rmcclure AT mdpartners.com ).
Project Participants
Preparation Tooling
Conference Call Schedule and Minutes
NO Meeting First week of May 2014 - WGM instead'
Weekly meeting to occur Tuesdays 4-5:30pm ET
This was changed in San Antonio Remember US ET changes on March 9 in the US so 4pm EDT is -4 UTC
Phone: +1 770-657-9270, Participant Code: 598745
Webmeeting Info - Note - no password is needed anymore:
Topic: Value Set Definition (VSD) weekly call Date & Time: Tuesday at 16:00 UTC-04 Duration: 1 hour 30 min To participate, click on the link below: https://go.mikogo.com/?sp=&sid=559867466 If the above link does not work, you can follow these steps instead to join a session: 1. Go to http://go.mikogo.com 2. Enter the Session ID: 559-867-466 3. Enter your name 4. Click "Join Session"
===Upcoming Meeting Agenda post WGM=== (5/13/14)
- 30 min: Logistics and key prior discussions
- Determine weekly meeting time and day. The current Tuesday 4-5:30p ET slot:
- While acceptable to our global community, overlaps some key meetings and normal life events.
- Current time is 6am in AUS and 9pm in UK. Thereby it may be that any change in the time will cause significant pain at one end of the globe.
- A change in day may help some folks.
- Quick review of discussion at non-vocab discussions
- Discussion with FHIR alignment on value set profile Monday Q3
- GGreive will create value set profile consistent with VSD, including extensions for non-base elements.
- We will consider adding multiple identifiers for VS
- M&M and SD
- Discussion with FHIR alignment on value set profile Monday Q3
- Vocab meeting was general overview
- Presentation given is here.
- See Vocab minutes
- Ballot target remains September 2014 (August submission). PSS due soon
- Determine weekly meeting time and day. The current Tuesday 4-5:30p ET slot:
- 60 min: Continue document work
- Finish discussion of PostCoordinationControl element
- Then continue discussion of ballot document section 5 items
- First, Review the STATUS work done 4/22. Section 5.2.3.3.1 - 5.2.3.3.4
- Potentially Discuss how proscriptive the spec should be to control different implementation interpretations.
- Discuss overall datatypes: MaximumMultiplicity datatype
- Consider continuing to Expansion Set section, or other
- Some of the sections have been "signed up for"
- RMcClure and JJames will focus on sections 2 and initial section 5
- Still hope HGrain will work on section 3
- WHuang and JCase will work on section 4
- Expect TKlein and LMcKenzie to work on front pieces and content of section 6
- WHuang will work on section 7
- We strongly hope that all participants will remain engaged in the project. This decision was not lightly taken and is a reflection on the amount of work and the importance of that work
- Additions to agenda?
- Running list of Completed Issues:
- We completed the review of the Logical Elements/Functions to define Content Logical Definition based on the MIF
- See Valueset MIF ContentDefinition for updated comments.
- Discussion on how to control use of DYNAMIC defined value sets continued on 12/20 meeting.
- Rob and Lloyd still have to create document and use cases to explain approach to "STATUS" / DYNAMIC stability.
- Metadata sheet review now complete
- Completed discussion of Value Set Expansion metadata with changes added to end of spreadsheet.
- A Value Set Definition can reference 0..* "Trusted Value Set Expansion Reference" that can be a service or an actual expansion
- An Expansion can be characterized by a date (required), a time (optional) and an identifier (optional)
- Completed discussion of Value Set Expansion metadata with changes added to end of spreadsheet.
- As of VSDSpec v18, UML model accurately describes those elements that are "definitional" in that if they change, a new value set or value set version should be created.
- 4/22/14 Completed documentation of determination of VSD version STATUSes
- This initial ballot will leave inclusion of concept expressions as value set members as OUT OF SCOPE. This remains highly important but will be addressed in the following ballot.
- This document has the abstracted decisions from minutes. [1]
- We will allow the use of slightly more complex datatypes (DSET and EN are currently used) [Example content attribute was discussed when this decision was reached]
- We completed the review of the Logical Elements/Functions to define Content Logical Definition based on the MIF
Latest (v23) version of doc here.
Minutes documents:
20131016_VSD_Minutes 20131022_VSD_Minutes 20131030_VSD_Minutes 20131106_VSD_Minutes 20131113_VSD_Minutes 20131120_VSD_Minutes 20131122_VSD_Minutes 20131127_VSD_Minutes 20131129_VSD_Minutes 20131204_VSD_Minutes 20131206_VSD_Minutes 20131211_VSD_Minutes 20131213_VSD_Minutes 20131218_VSD_Minutes 20131220_VSD_Minutes 20140103_VSD_Minutes 20140108_VSD_Minutes 20140115_VSD_Minutes 20140128_VSD_Minutes 20140204_VSD_Minutes 20140211_VSD_Minutes 20140218_VSD_Minutes 20140225_VSD_Minutes 20140304_VSD_Minutes 20140311_VSD_Minutes 20140318_VSD_Minutes 20140325_VSD_Minutes 20140401_VSD_Minutes 20140408_VSD_Minutes 20140415_VSD_Minutes 20140422_VSD_Minutes 20140429_VSD_Minutes
Key Target Dates
Now targeting September 2014 ballot submission June. 29, 2014 - intention to ballot final day. July 13, 2014 - initial content deadline August 3, 2014 - Final deadline for content.
Project Documents
The project working documents are being maintained using Google Docs. These can be found at: Links to project documents