Difference between revisions of "FHIR Governance Precepts"
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| '''Precept ID'''||'''Short Name'''||'''Objectives'''||'''Policies'''||'''Standards''' | | '''Precept ID'''||'''Short Name'''||'''Objectives'''||'''Policies'''||'''Standards''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | '''Pr-01'''||'''FHIR Adoption Scope'''||<p> | + | | '''Pr-01'''||'''FHIR Adoption Scope'''||<p>Initial market segmentation and value proposition. Identification of scope of Resources for initial DSTU. Criteria for expanding scope including discovery of requirements, PL Vitality Assessment.</p><p>'''''Summarize the KNOWN CURRENT serious implementations - we cannot control it, but we should document it. Resources are what they are.'''''</p> ||Humbly suggest that the "Policy" for all of these, presuming a decent definition of the objective is simply:<br/> '''"Make it happen!"'''||Similarly, for the most part, standards can be delegated to either the methodology or the specification itself. |
|- | |- | ||
− | | '''Pr-02'''||'''FHIR Org Maturity Model'''||<p>Definition of stages of organizational maturity for the design, development, and deployment of FHIR.</p><p>''Seems a futile exercise, in an organization where its maturity governs what it does rather than the other way around. Might be a great sociology exercise, but will it help us find people resources, much less mature ones?''</p>|||| | + | | '''Pr-02'''||'''FHIR Org Maturity Model'''||<p>Definition of stages of organizational maturity for the design, development, and deployment of FHIR.</p><p>'''''Seems a futile exercise, in an organization where its maturity governs what it does rather than the other way around. Might be a great sociology exercise, but will it help us find people resources, much less mature ones?'''''</p>|||| |
|- | |- | ||
− | | '''Pr-03'''||'''FHIR Resourcing Model'''||<p>Framework for identifying, assigning, and managing Resources necessary to product FHIR products.</p> | + | | '''Pr-03'''||'''FHIR Resourcing Model'''||<p>Framework for identifying, assigning, and managing Resources necessary to product FHIR products.</p><p>'''''See comment above'''''</p>|||| |
|- | |- | ||
− | | '''Pr-04'''||'''HL7 Business Dictionary'''||<p>Organizational repository for "terms of the art" that is used and contributed to by the FHIR team</p><p>''Suggest this is a concise recitation definitions of resources, extensions, profiles, mappings, and referfence implementations.''</p>|||| | + | | '''Pr-04'''||'''HL7 Business Dictionary'''||<p>Organizational repository for "terms of the art" that is used and contributed to by the FHIR team</p><p>'''''Suggest this is a concise recitation definitions of resources, extensions, profiles, mappings, and referfence implementations.'''''</p>|||| |
|- | |- | ||
− | | '''Pr-05'''||'''Resource Meta-Data Standards'''||<p>Standards for the identification and description of Resources that ensure uniqueness, discover-ability, effective normalization, and compositional coherence of Resources.</p><p>''Sounds like something Beeler proposed. Need to keep it real. How well is current meta-data doing with these principles?'' </p>|||| | + | | '''Pr-05'''||'''Resource Meta-Data Standards'''||<p>Standards for the identification and description of Resources that ensure uniqueness, discover-ability, effective normalization, and compositional coherence of Resources.</p><p>'''''Sounds like something Beeler proposed. Need to keep it real. How well is current meta-data doing with these principles?''''' </p>|||| |
|- | |- | ||
− | | '''Pr-06'''||'''Resource Ontology'''||<p>''Big words. What's it mean?''</p>|||| | + | | '''Pr-06'''||'''Resource Ontology'''||<p>'''''Big words. What's it mean?'''''</p>|||| |
|- | |- | ||
| '''Pr-07'''||'''Resource Taxonomy'''||Taxonomy for Resources|||| | | '''Pr-07'''||'''Resource Taxonomy'''||Taxonomy for Resources|||| |
Revision as of 05:02, 22 April 2014
Precept Table
' | ' | Goals | Constraints | Conformity |
Precept ID | Short Name | Objectives | Policies | Standards |
Pr-01 | FHIR Adoption Scope | Initial market segmentation and value proposition. Identification of scope of Resources for initial DSTU. Criteria for expanding scope including discovery of requirements, PL Vitality Assessment. Summarize the KNOWN CURRENT serious implementations - we cannot control it, but we should document it. Resources are what they are. |
Humbly suggest that the "Policy" for all of these, presuming a decent definition of the objective is simply: "Make it happen!" |
Similarly, for the most part, standards can be delegated to either the methodology or the specification itself. |
Pr-02 | FHIR Org Maturity Model | Definition of stages of organizational maturity for the design, development, and deployment of FHIR. Seems a futile exercise, in an organization where its maturity governs what it does rather than the other way around. Might be a great sociology exercise, but will it help us find people resources, much less mature ones? |
||
Pr-03 | FHIR Resourcing Model | Framework for identifying, assigning, and managing Resources necessary to product FHIR products. See comment above |
||
Pr-04 | HL7 Business Dictionary | Organizational repository for "terms of the art" that is used and contributed to by the FHIR team Suggest this is a concise recitation definitions of resources, extensions, profiles, mappings, and referfence implementations. |
||
Pr-05 | Resource Meta-Data Standards | Standards for the identification and description of Resources that ensure uniqueness, discover-ability, effective normalization, and compositional coherence of Resources. Sounds like something Beeler proposed. Need to keep it real. How well is current meta-data doing with these principles? |
||
Pr-06 | Resource Ontology | Big words. What's it mean? |
||
Pr-07 | Resource Taxonomy | Taxonomy for Resources | ||
Pr-08 | FHIR Inventory Scope Definition | |||
Pr-09 | Candidate Resource Naming | Taxonomy and Standards for Resource Naming Precept: "Methodology needs to provide this." |
||
Pr-10 | Resource Normalization | Resources are context neutral, composable, unique Preceding says it all." |
||
Pr-11 | Resource Versioning | Standards for versioning of Resources Precept: "Methodology needs to provide this." |
||
Pr-12 | Resource Design | Methodologies and standards for resource design Precept: "Methodology needs to provide this." |
||
Pr-13 | Resource Description | Methodology and standards for metadata and requirements traceability Precept: "Methodology needs to provide this." |
||
Pr-14 | Resource Template | Design pattern for building a Resource definition Precept: "Methodology needs to provide this." |
||
Pr-15 | Profile Template | Design pattern for profiling and assembling composite Resources Precept: "Methodology needs to provide this." |
||
Pr-16 | Requirements Traceability | |||
Pr-17 | Implementation Guide | Framework, methodology and standards for developing and maintaining a FHIR implementation guide | ||
Pr-18 | Internal Publication | Methodology, standards, and processes for publishing of FHIR products internally for review and balloting | ||
Pr-19 | Balloting | Methodology, standards, and processes for balloting of FHIR products | ||
Pr-20 | External Publication | Methodology, standards, and processes for publishing of FHIR products as standards for use | ||
Pr-21 | Resource Usage Tracking | Methodology and processes for tracking Resource utilization by HL7 customers | ||
Pr-22 | Resource Vitality Triggers | Metrics and methodology for assessing the vitality of Resources and triggering | ||
Pr-23 | Resource Registry | Repository for all Resources, planned, in development, ballot type, and published. Includes custodian identity and contact information, versioning history, "where referenced", effective date, retirement date, etc as defined in metadata definition. | ||
Pr-24 | Resource Versioning Strategy |
Conformity Metrics
Metric ID | Short Name | Type | Description | Precepts applied to |
Governance Processes
Process Id | Short Name | Governance Point | Type | Description | Tools | Methodology |
People
Role | Role Assigned To: | Product Specific Responsibilities | Required Skills | Required Subject Matter Expertise |
Administrator - Resource | ||||
Analyst - Business | ||||
Analyst - Resource | ||||
Architect - Resource | ||||
Archivist | ||||
Ballot Lead | ||||
Custodian | ||||
Design Standards Custodian | ||||
Developer | ||||
Enterprise Architect | ||||
Governance Board | ||||
Governance Specialist | ||||
Management Group | ||||
Methodology Facilitator | ||||
Policy Custodian | ||||
Product Registry Custodian | ||||
Project Lead | ||||
Proponent | ||||
Publisher | ||||
Quality Assurance Specialist | ||||
Security Specialist | ||||
Technical Communications Specialist | ||||
Template Custodian |
Reference Section
Reference Values | ' | Description |
Core Processes | ||
Conformity Assessment | ||
Education | ||
Escalation | ||
Vitality Assessment | ||
Conformity Metrics | ||
Cost | Within HL7 we need a definition of "Cost" or other proxies for measuring the relative cost to the organization of certain choices. In some cases, cost includes actual budget consumption for tooling and other issues, in other cases the cost might be scarcity of time, reduced or unavailable capacity, etc. | |
Threshold | ||
Standards-based | ||
Vitality Metrics | ||
Conformity | ||
Cost | ||
Performance | ||
Vitality Triggers | ||
IT Shift | ||
Metrics | ||
Organizational Shifts | ||
Periodic | ||
Strategic Business Adjustment | ||
Strategic IT Adjustment | ||
PL Governance Points | ||
Balloting and Ballot Resolution | ||
Conformity Assessment | ||
Line Planning | ||
PL Vitality Assessment | ||
Production | ||
Publication | ||
Requirements Definition | ||
Governance Tooling | ||
QA Tool | ||
Registry | ||
Repository | ||
Skills | ||
Publication management | ||
Modeling | ||
Technical Editing | ||
Quality Assurance | ||
Role | ||
Administrator - Resource | ||
Analyst - Business | Responsible for the gathering of requirements, the decomposition of those requirements into discrete components that can be solved for, and the provision of conformance criteria that will allow validation that requirements have been met. | |
Analyst - Resource | Responsible for identifying the taxonomy of Resources, their appropriate forms, as well as ensuring Resources are fit-for-purpose. Defines conformance criteria that will allow validation that a resource is well-formed and properly normalized. | |
Architect - Resource | Provides the design framework within which Resources are described and and developed. An expert in the structure of Resources and their recomposition. | |
Archivist | Responsible for collecting, editing, and assembling documentation to support the design, development, balloting and publication of products. Also responsible for posting agendas, capturing, organizing, and posting meeting minutes, and monitoring processes and metrics related to continuity of work. | |
Ballot Lead | Responsible for ensuring ballot content is complete (relative to the nature of the particular ballot), timely, and transmitted for pre-ballot publishing. Responsible for reconciliation of ballot responses, assignment of related revisions, and communication of the reconciliaton to ballot commenters. | |
Custodian | Responsible for the management and governance of one or more Resources. This includes protecting the integrity of the Resource content as well as its associated functional boundary. Ensures that Resources are appropriately deployed and maintained, their usage is appropriate and monitored, that they are discoverable, versioning is mangaged, and if necessary that they are appropriately and effectively retired. | |
Design Standards Custodian | Ensures that design standards are kept in alignment and used wherever appropriate. Responsible for the evolution of design standards as well as their enforcement. | |
Developer | A standards designer / developer proficient in the tools, methodologies, and product standards required to build Resources. | |
Enterprise Architect | Assists in Product Line planning from the perspective of organizations that will consume the products. Contributes to enterprise design standards. Ensures that agnostic Resources are properly positioned. Helps define Resource inventory blueprint. Involved in Resource planning, inventory analysis, Resource modeling. | |
Governance Board | Ensure the organizational asset is effectively and appropriately governed to achieve its strategic goals and objectives while fitting within the larger goals and objectives of the organization. | |
Governance Specialist | ||
Management Group | ||
Methodology Facilitator | ||
Policy Custodian | ||
Product Registry Custodian | ||
Project Lead | ||
Proponent | ||
Publisher | ||
Quality Assurance Specialist | ||
Security Specialist | ||
Technical Communications Specialist | ||
Template Custodian | ||
Subject Matter Expertise | ||
Anatomic Pathology | ||
Anesthesia | ||
Arden Syntax | ||
Attachments | ||
CCOW | ||
Child Health | ||
Clinical Decision Support | ||
Clinical Genomics | ||
Clinical Quality Information | ||
Clinical Research | ||
Clinical Statement | ||
Community Based Collaborative Care | ||
Conformance & Testing | ||
Education | ||
Electronic Health Records | ||
Electronic Services | ||
Emergency Care | ||
Financial Management | ||
Governance and Operations | ||
Health Care Devices | ||
HL7 Policy | ||
Imaging Integration | ||
Infrastructure and Messaging | ||
Marketing | ||
Mobile Health | ||
Modeling and Methodology | ||
Orders and Observations | ||
Organizational Relations | ||
Patient Administration | ||
Patient Care | ||
Patient Safety | ||
Pharmacy | ||
Process Improvement | ||
Project Services | ||
Public Health and Emergency Response | ||
Publishing | ||
RIM Based Application Architecture | ||
Security | ||
Services Oriented Architecture | ||
Structured Documents | ||
Templates | ||
Tooling | ||
Vocabulary |