This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "20130529 BAM Modeling"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
===============================================================================---> | ===============================================================================---> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |x|| Calvin Beebe |
|- | |- | ||
| || Woody Beeler | | || Woody Beeler | ||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
| ||Bo Dagnall | | ||Bo Dagnall | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | || Jean Duteau, |
|- | |- | ||
| || Tony Julian | | || Tony Julian | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Austin Kreisler, | + | |x || Austin Kreisler, |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Lynn Laakso | + | | x|| Lynn Laakso |
|- | |- | ||
| || Cecil Lynch | | || Cecil Lynch | ||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
| || Ravi Natarajan | | || Ravi Natarajan | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Ron Parker | + | |x || Ron Parker |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Brian Pech | + | | x|| Brian Pech |
|- | |- | ||
| || Melva Peters | | || Melva Peters | ||
| Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
===Minutes=== | ===Minutes=== | ||
| + | Need to identify deliverables on | ||
| + | *notional definition of what that product family/line would be | ||
| + | *How you will stand up Governance, how you will stand up Management, how to stand up methodology. Agenda division, or governance one meeting/month, etc? | ||
| + | *high-level market segmentation and statement of what they value, what constitutes success | ||
| + | *PSS they would declare the interested parties, who are the customers, etc | ||
| + | *Risks of doing or not doing the effort should be elucidated | ||
| + | Ron joins | ||
| + | *Next week's SDWG cochairs call is showing unavailability for several cochairs. We can put this off to discuss next week what they need to do to develop a PSS. | ||
| + | *First phase is planning on how one will stand up a product family, where the second phase is actually standing it up. | ||
| + | *Austin in crunch mode for CDA R3 | ||
| + | |||
| + | Adjourned 2:25 PM | ||
===Meeting Outcomes=== | ===Meeting Outcomes=== | ||
Latest revision as of 18:24, 29 May 2013
TSC representatives and ArB to jointly develop content for the BAM for the Product Line Architecture Program
| HL7 BAM Modeling Call Minutes Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371# |
Date: 2013-05-29 Time: 2 pm Eastern Time | ||
| Facilitator | Ron Parker | Note taker(s) | Lynn |
| Attendee | Name
| ||
| x | Calvin Beebe | ||
| Woody Beeler | |||
| Jane Curry | |||
| Bo Dagnall | |||
| Jean Duteau, | |||
| Tony Julian | |||
| x | Austin Kreisler, | ||
| x | Lynn Laakso | ||
| Cecil Lynch | |||
| Ravi Natarajan | |||
| x | Ron Parker | ||
| x | Brian Pech | ||
| Melva Peters | |||
| Quorum Requirements Met: (yes/No) | |||
| quorum definition? | |||
Agenda
Agenda
- Review minutes of 20130522_BAM Modeling
- update of ArB a-ha moment on three axes of product platform as a paradigm (technology binding/context); product line as a business domain (Function), and product family as a methodology (Form)
- Discuss Security Risk Assessment Cookbook process
- Update on Tasks identified in last discussion
- Presentation at SDWG cochairs call on setting up PSS for the CDA R2 IG product family.
- Present a chopped down version of Governance 101 along with concrete suggestions on what to do with their agenda especially separating out governance and management and teasing out methodology as well.
- Need BAM checklist for initiation of PSS for CDA IG Product Family and identify deliverables of the project WRT goals/objectives/risks, RACI chart. List of things you need to establish as part of the project.
Reference Documents
- BAM Overview BAM status as of Jan WGM
- Fill in spreadsheet
Minutes
Need to identify deliverables on
- notional definition of what that product family/line would be
- How you will stand up Governance, how you will stand up Management, how to stand up methodology. Agenda division, or governance one meeting/month, etc?
- high-level market segmentation and statement of what they value, what constitutes success
- PSS they would declare the interested parties, who are the customers, etc
- Risks of doing or not doing the effort should be elucidated
Ron joins
- Next week's SDWG cochairs call is showing unavailability for several cochairs. We can put this off to discuss next week what they need to do to develop a PSS.
- First phase is planning on how one will stand up a product family, where the second phase is actually standing it up.
- Austin in crunch mode for CDA R3
Adjourned 2:25 PM
Meeting Outcomes
| Actions
|
| Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2013 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.
