Difference between revisions of "Conformance 28th June"
Frankoemig (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Participants== | ==Participants== | ||
| + | *Len Gallagher | ||
| + | *Pete Gilbert | ||
| + | *Joann Larson | ||
*John Lyons | *John Lyons | ||
*Frank Oemig | *Frank Oemig | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==Topics== | ==Topics== | ||
| Line 12: | Line 13: | ||
===Approval of the agenda=== | ===Approval of the agenda=== | ||
| − | + | approved with minor modifications. | |
===Approval of minutes=== | ===Approval of minutes=== | ||
| − | + | motion to approve minutes by Len/Pete. no discussion. all in favor. | |
| + | |||
| + | ===Review action items from May 24th=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | no open items: add examples + contact MnM for definition of realm. motion to approve Len/Pete. no discussion. all in favor. closed. | ||
===RFI for next ballot=== | ===RFI for next ballot=== | ||
| Line 24: | Line 29: | ||
===Definition of realm=== | ===Definition of realm=== | ||
| − | + | After a short discussion we agreed upon the enhanced definition: | |
| − | + | ||
| + | *each realm has an owner for administrative purposes | ||
| + | *is identified by an OID | ||
| + | *is not limited to the border lines of a country | ||
===Ballot Reconciliation=== | ===Ballot Reconciliation=== | ||
| − | + | Discussion about required/unspecified/not permitted: Len has discussed it with MnM, but not made a motion to change it. (The group is more in favor to use optional instead of unspecified.) | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | ( | ||
| − | + | Discussion on item #10 (line 41): Different meanings for message definition and instantiation. Here we have to prepare something for the next conf call. If modelling refinement is different from message instantiation in the sense of conformance, then we have to mention it explicitly in the document. | |
| − | === | + | ===Side Discussion=== |
| − | + | It is in question, whether we will have a conf call next week due to holiday? We will try to continue next week. | |
Latest revision as of 21:38, 25 July 2006
This is just in preparation of the conf call.
Contents
Participants
- Len Gallagher
- Pete Gilbert
- Joann Larson
- John Lyons
- Frank Oemig
Topics
Approval of the agenda
approved with minor modifications.
Approval of minutes
motion to approve minutes by Len/Pete. no discussion. all in favor.
Review action items from May 24th
no open items: add examples + contact MnM for definition of realm. motion to approve Len/Pete. no discussion. all in favor. closed.
RFI for next ballot
We do not have a real chance to go to ballot in time. So we prepare our documents in sync with the voters for the next WGM in Boca Raton.
Definition of realm
After a short discussion we agreed upon the enhanced definition:
- each realm has an owner for administrative purposes
- is identified by an OID
- is not limited to the border lines of a country
Ballot Reconciliation
Discussion about required/unspecified/not permitted: Len has discussed it with MnM, but not made a motion to change it. (The group is more in favor to use optional instead of unspecified.)
Discussion on item #10 (line 41): Different meanings for message definition and instantiation. Here we have to prepare something for the next conf call. If modelling refinement is different from message instantiation in the sense of conformance, then we have to mention it explicitly in the document.
Side Discussion
It is in question, whether we will have a conf call next week due to holiday? We will try to continue next week.
