Difference between revisions of "Anatomic Pathology Work Group"
(→Legend) |
|||
Line 174: | Line 174: | ||
|AM | |AM | ||
|Q1 | |Q1 | ||
− | | | + | |[[Image:Technical_med.gif |technical icon]] |
− | | | + | |TBD. Possible further talks on WG topics |
− | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 184: | Line 183: | ||
| | | | ||
|Q2 | |Q2 | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
− | |||
| | | | ||
| | | |
Revision as of 13:57, 31 December 2012
Contents
Status
20111102 This status is in process of being updated
The Pathology Special Interest Group is in ramp-up stage. There is a sizable group of people who believe that the time is ripe for a CDA based standard for Surgical Pathology reports, and that we will also need to maintain a migration path to HL7 v2 based messaging. This will be the goal for the first standard.
The vision would be to have an interoperable surg path report standard implemented by most major pathology system vendors by the end of 2007. That means we should have a pilot in fall 2007 (APIII venue?). The scope and depth of the specification would be the normal free text report, with required structured data elements for basic specimen description as well as the College of American Pathologists' (CAP) "protocols" of synoptic report data, as structured data elements.
Content
Current Agenda for January 2013 WG Meeting
Legend
- - business
- - ballot reconciliation
- - technical
- / = joint session
- + = session with representatives of
Past Agendas
Agenda for San Diego, 2011
Agenda for San Antonio, 2012
Agenda for Vancouver, BC 2012
Agenda for Baltimore, 2012
Temporary Contents
Files for Review
Update 20120628: Updated Spec ID doc