This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "OO CR113 - OBX-14 timestamp"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Riki merrick (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{OO Open LRI IG Change Requests}} Return to OO Change Requests page. {|width=100% cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2 border=1 || '''Submitted by:''' R...") |
Hbuitendijk (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{OO | + | {{OO Closed LRI IG Change Requests}} |
Return to [[:Category:OO Change Requests|OO Change Requests]] page. | Return to [[:Category:OO Change Requests|OO Change Requests]] page. | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
== Rationale == | == Rationale == | ||
| − | + | *Motion to find the proposal not persuasive. The various optionality and required values do allow for the proper use of TS_4 and TS_5, even though it looks confusing. Ken McCaslin, Glen Moy | |
| + | **Against: 0; Abstain: 0; In Favor: 8 | ||
== Discussion == | == Discussion == | ||
Latest revision as of 21:18, 4 December 2012
Return to OO Change Requests page.
| Submitted by: Riki Merrick | Revision date: <<Revision Date>> |
| Submitted date: 27 November 2012 | Change request ID: OO CR113 |
| Standard/IG: LRI IG | Artifact ID, Name: <<Artifact ID, Name>> |
Issue
OBX-14 time stamp datatype (currently listed as TS_5) needs to match OBR-7 (TS_4) and SPM-17.1 (TS_4), so that when the specimen collection time is not known they can use the default. Add usage note: When the OBX-14 is not related to a collected specimen, granularity to at least the day is preferred.
Recommendation
Rationale
- Motion to find the proposal not persuasive. The various optionality and required values do allow for the proper use of TS_4 and TS_5, even though it looks confusing. Ken McCaslin, Glen Moy
- Against: 0; Abstain: 0; In Favor: 8
