Difference between revisions of "Anatomic Pathology Work Group"
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
=== Agenda for San Diego, 2011 === | === Agenda for San Diego, 2011 === | ||
| + | |||
*[[AP WGM Agenda September 2011]] | *[[AP WGM Agenda September 2011]] | ||
=== Agenda for San Antonio, 2012 === | === Agenda for San Antonio, 2012 === | ||
| + | |||
*[[AP WGM Agenda Jan 2012]] | *[[AP WGM Agenda Jan 2012]] | ||
| Line 31: | Line 33: | ||
*[[AP WGM Agenda May 2012]] | *[[AP WGM Agenda May 2012]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Agenda for Baltimore, 2012 === | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[AP_WGM_Agenda_September_2012 | AP WGM Agenda September 2012]] | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| + | |||
=='''Temporary Contents'''== | =='''Temporary Contents'''== | ||
Revision as of 18:04, 16 November 2012
Contents
Status
20111102 This status is in process of being updated
The Pathology Special Interest Group is in ramp-up stage. There is a sizable group of people who believe that the time is ripe for a CDA based standard for Surgical Pathology reports, and that we will also need to maintain a migration path to HL7 v2 based messaging. This will be the goal for the first standard.
The vision would be to have an interoperable surg path report standard implemented by most major pathology system vendors by the end of 2007. That means we should have a pilot in fall 2007 (APIII venue?). The scope and depth of the specification would be the normal free text report, with required structured data elements for basic specimen description as well as the College of American Pathologists' (CAP) "protocols" of synoptic report data, as structured data elements.
Content
Current Agenda
Past Agendas
Agenda for San Diego, 2011
Agenda for San Antonio, 2012
Agenda for Vancouver, BC 2012
Agenda for Baltimore, 2012
Temporary Contents
Files for Review
Update 20120628: Updated Spec ID doc
