This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "November 6, 2012 Security Working Group Conference Call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
*RE: Approval of Minutes and Agenda – Presiding Cochair, Mike Davis…, asked for approval of the minutes and agenda. - It was decided that the minutes would not be approved because the Oct. 30 meeting was an informal meeting that the CoChairs did not attend. | *RE: Approval of Minutes and Agenda – Presiding Cochair, Mike Davis…, asked for approval of the minutes and agenda. - It was decided that the minutes would not be approved because the Oct. 30 meeting was an informal meeting that the CoChairs did not attend. | ||
*RE: '''HCS Ballot Prep Update'''- 2 announcements have been made: One is for the health classification system release 1. The second the second one is for the oncology normative release ballot. The piece that is being driven is the definition of the fields that are specific to the health care domain that we’re hoping to move toward normative status. This is a trimmed down version of what was balloted before. The fields are normative. There is a table in the document that describes the fields. Just the fields and not the terminology that goes into the fields. Conformance Possibilities: The first possibilities is with NIST fixed pub 188 it has a classification theme and is modeled after some HTS requirements as well that could be used. Conformance is not required until we’re getting ready for normative. Kathleen has a list of the labels and will send those out to the group. 10181-3 has a lot of information about labels and ISO 2382 is another one that has a lot of information about labels. Kathleen will send this information out to the group by the end of the day. | *RE: '''HCS Ballot Prep Update'''- 2 announcements have been made: One is for the health classification system release 1. The second the second one is for the oncology normative release ballot. The piece that is being driven is the definition of the fields that are specific to the health care domain that we’re hoping to move toward normative status. This is a trimmed down version of what was balloted before. The fields are normative. There is a table in the document that describes the fields. Just the fields and not the terminology that goes into the fields. Conformance Possibilities: The first possibilities is with NIST fixed pub 188 it has a classification theme and is modeled after some HTS requirements as well that could be used. Conformance is not required until we’re getting ready for normative. Kathleen has a list of the labels and will send those out to the group. 10181-3 has a lot of information about labels and ISO 2382 is another one that has a lot of information about labels. Kathleen will send this information out to the group by the end of the day. | ||
− | *RE: '''Security and Privacy Ontology Ballot Update''' - John is still getting up to speed. The oncology release has been submitted as a first normative ballot. John needs the link to the comments. If they want to submit a reconciliation, you must do so by 11/18. | + | *RE: '''Security and Privacy Ontology Ballot Update''' - John is still getting up to speed. The oncology release has been submitted as a first normative ballot. John needs the link to the comments spreadsheet. Kathleen will send the spreadsheet out to the group by the end of the day. If they want to submit a reconciliation, you must do so by 11/18. |
*RE: '''DS4P''' - | *RE: '''DS4P''' - | ||
− | *RE: '''Integrity Metadata''' - | + | *RE: '''Integrity Metadata''' - Due to the high level of interest in records management, we’re framing the discussion around figuring out the vocabulary. We are working to understand the bridges between details and the functional support for records management and how that is conceptualized. We did make some preliminary suggestions and particular points that we think will be of interest in drilling down a bit and sent those over to Mike. |
*RE: Other Business, Agenda for Next call, Action Items, and Wrap Up | *RE: Other Business, Agenda for Next call, Action Items, and Wrap Up | ||
Meeting adjourned at 6:05 PM Eastern | Meeting adjourned at 6:05 PM Eastern |
Revision as of 14:36, 7 November 2012
Contents
Security Working Group Meeting
Meeting Information Back to Security Main Page
Attendees
- Bill Braithwaite
- John Carter
- Kathleen Connor
- Mike Davis Security Cochair
- Reed D. Gelzer
- Rob Horn
- Adrienne James
- Jim Kretz
- Ted Lesueur
- John Moehrke Security Cochair
- Paul L Petronelli
- Patrick Pyette
- Arnie Rosenthal
- Ken Salyards
- Jennifer T. Sisto
- Richard Thoreson CBCC Cochair
- Serafina Versaggi
- Trish Williams Security Cochair
Agenda
- (05 min) Roll Call, Approve October 30, 2012 Security Working Group Conference Call Minutes & Accept Agenda
- (20 min) HCS Ballot Prep Update: Prospective Normative Security Labeling Scheme, Conformance Criteria, and Security Labeling System revision – Mike Davis
- (10 min) Security and Privacy Ontology Ballot Update – John Carter
- (20 min) Integrity Metadata – Group discussion
- (05 min) Other Business, Agenda for Next call, Action Items, and Wrap Up
Minutes
- RE: Approval of Minutes and Agenda – Presiding Cochair, Mike Davis…, asked for approval of the minutes and agenda. - It was decided that the minutes would not be approved because the Oct. 30 meeting was an informal meeting that the CoChairs did not attend.
- RE: HCS Ballot Prep Update- 2 announcements have been made: One is for the health classification system release 1. The second the second one is for the oncology normative release ballot. The piece that is being driven is the definition of the fields that are specific to the health care domain that we’re hoping to move toward normative status. This is a trimmed down version of what was balloted before. The fields are normative. There is a table in the document that describes the fields. Just the fields and not the terminology that goes into the fields. Conformance Possibilities: The first possibilities is with NIST fixed pub 188 it has a classification theme and is modeled after some HTS requirements as well that could be used. Conformance is not required until we’re getting ready for normative. Kathleen has a list of the labels and will send those out to the group. 10181-3 has a lot of information about labels and ISO 2382 is another one that has a lot of information about labels. Kathleen will send this information out to the group by the end of the day.
- RE: Security and Privacy Ontology Ballot Update - John is still getting up to speed. The oncology release has been submitted as a first normative ballot. John needs the link to the comments spreadsheet. Kathleen will send the spreadsheet out to the group by the end of the day. If they want to submit a reconciliation, you must do so by 11/18.
- RE: DS4P -
- RE: Integrity Metadata - Due to the high level of interest in records management, we’re framing the discussion around figuring out the vocabulary. We are working to understand the bridges between details and the functional support for records management and how that is conceptualized. We did make some preliminary suggestions and particular points that we think will be of interest in drilling down a bit and sent those over to Mike.
- RE: Other Business, Agenda for Next call, Action Items, and Wrap Up
Meeting adjourned at 6:05 PM Eastern
Action Items
- RE:Kathleen will have the vocabulary annotated and out by the end of the day today.
- RE:Kathleen is going to get the link to the comments over to John – comments and reconciliation.
- RE:Kathleen to check on the process for submitting reconciliation for ontology – Do we need to reconcile it for the second round of informative ballot?
- RE:Mike would like to set up a meeting with John to go through it in detail to resolve any comments if any.