This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "OO CR101 - Specimen Identifier"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Hbuitendijk (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{OO Open Change Requests}} {{OO Open LRI IG Change Requests}} Return to OO Change Requests page. {|width=100% cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2 borde...") |
|||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
== Resolution == | == Resolution == | ||
| + | completed as Errata item 12 published 26 September 2012 | ||
Revision as of 20:43, 18 October 2012
Return to OO Change Requests page.
| Submitted by: | Revision date: <<Revision Date>> |
| Submitted date: | Change request ID: |
| Standard/IG: Implementation Guide | Artifact ID, Name: |
Contents
Issue
Recommendation
Rationale
Discussion
Recommended Action Items
Resolution
Return to OO Change Requests page.
| Submitted by: Hans Buitendijk | Revision date: <<Revision Date>> |
| Submitted date: 24 September 2012 | Change request ID: OO CR101 |
| Standard/IG: Implementation Guide | Artifact ID, Name: <<Artifact ID, Name>> |
Issue
On page 56 in the message structure for the Specimen Group it states: "The specimen group is required if known in the ORU and is used to carry specimen information that is no longer contained in the OBR segment. It also provides a place for the specimen number. Each specimen group documents a single sample."
On page 84 in the SPM segment the specimen identifier, SPM-2, is set to O.
Either one or the other must be fixed.
Recommendation
Suggest to make SPM-2 RE as it is the only way to disambiguiate multiple SPMs.
I am not sure whether we can include this in the errate, but if we don't its a big gap.
Rationale
Discussion
Recommended Action Items
Resolution
completed as Errata item 12 published 26 September 2012
