OO CR090 - Conformance Statements

Return to OO Change Requests page.

Submitted by: SMSS	Revision date: <<Revision Date>>
Submitted date: 31-Jul-2012	Change request ID: OO CR090
Standard/IG: Implementation Guide	Artifact ID, Name: <<Artifact ID, Name>>

Issue

• Conformance Statements: LRI_NG Profile
  • SMMS1: It seems like this should be LRI_NG_RN instead of LRI_NG because OBR.50 usage is O for RU
  • Rob Snelick: Agreed. This should be a conformance statement for RN. I thought this was a ballot -2 comment (maybe it got missed?).
  • Hans Buitendijk: Agreed with the issue, but the solution should be "LRI_RN Profile"
  • LRI-43: The value of OBR-50 (Parent Universal Service Identifier) SHALL be identical to the value of ORC-31 (Parent Universal Service Identifier).
  • Motion to move LRI-43 to the LRI_RN Profile section and delete the LRI_NG section as it is now empty and put into errata. No change to the LRI-43 identifier. Bob Yencha, Ken McCaslin.
    • Against: 0; Abstain: 2; In Favor: 7
• Conformance Statements: LRI_RU Profile
  • LRI-44: OBR-2 (Placer Order Number) when present SHALL be unique for each OBR segment in the message.
    • SMSS2: This conformance statement seems to be the same as LRI-46
    • Rob Snelick: Agreed. I don’t recall when LRI-46 and 47 got added. Maybe there is a subtle difference in the two but I can’t figure out what it is.
  • LRI-45 : OBR-3 (Filler Order Number) SHALL be unique for each OBR segment in the message.
  • LRI-46: The value of OBR-2 (Placer Order Number) SHALL NOT be valued identical to another instance of OBR-2 (Placer Order Number) in the message.
  • LRI-47: The value of OBR-3 (Filler Order Number) SHALL NOT be valued identical to another instance of OBR-3 (Filler Order Number) in the message.
  • Motion to mark LRI-44 and LRI-45 as deprecated (Label and strikethrough). Ken McCaslin, Riki Merrick
    • Note that the errata document would have the label and strikethrough. It would be maintained for 2-3 versions, similar to other HL7 standards.
    • Against: 0; Abstain: 0; In Favor: 9
• CWE-CRO
  • Alternate Identifier
    • The alternate identifier (from the alternate coding system) should be the closest match for the identifier found in CWE_CR.1.
    • SMSS4: This should be CWE_CRO.1 instead of CWE_CR.1?
    • Rob: Correct. CWE_CRO was added and we forgot to change the condition predicates accordingly.
  • Name of Alternate Coding System
    • Condition Predicate: If CWE_CR.4 (Alternate Identifier) is valued
    • SMSS5: This should be CWE_CRO.4 instead of CWE_CR.4?
    • Rob: Correct. CWE_CRO was added and we forgot to change the condition predicates accordingly.
  • Motion to accept typo fix for errata. Bob Yencha, Ken McCaslin
    • Against: 0; Abstain: 0; In Favor: 9

Recommendation

Suggest to hyperlink from Data Type in each table to the appropriate data types as part of official publication.