This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "MnM Minutes CC 20120620"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
2) Delete the Logistics template reference | 2) Delete the Logistics template reference | ||
{{:MnM Conference Call Logistics}} below | {{:MnM Conference Call Logistics}} below | ||
| − | -->[[Category:2012 MnM Minutes | + | -->[[Category:2012 MnM Minutes]] |
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
=M&M Conference Call 4:00PM Eastern Time (Date above)= | =M&M Conference Call 4:00PM Eastern Time (Date above)= | ||
| − | |||
[[:Category:2012 MnM Minutes|Return to MnM Minutes]] | [[:Category:2012 MnM Minutes|Return to MnM Minutes]] | ||
| + | ==Attendees== | ||
| + | Beeler, Stechishin, Pech, Hamill, Hausam | ||
| + | |||
==Agenda== | ==Agenda== | ||
*Approve [[MnM_Minutes_CC_20120613| Minutes Prior Meeting on June 13]] | *Approve [[MnM_Minutes_CC_20120613| Minutes Prior Meeting on June 13]] | ||
| + | *CMETs Ballot Project Approval and of NIB | ||
| + | ==Business== | ||
| + | *Approved agenda - Stechishin, Pech unanimous | ||
| + | *Amended then [[MnM_Minutes_CC_20120613| approved Minutes of June 13]] | ||
==CMETs Ballot Project Approval and of NIB== | ==CMETs Ballot Project Approval and of NIB== | ||
| + | ===Status summary by Beeler, stechishin and Hamill: === | ||
| + | |||
Detailed review of the CMETs status, including the dates and results of prior reconciliation leave us with a singular conclusion. MnM must undertake to sponsor a Normative Ballot that includes all CMETs previously balloted (and '''mostly approved''') as Releases 3 through Release 9 -- everything since release 2. While the vast majority of these are "clean" (have no outstanding negatives), the package as a whole has gone too long without ANSI-recognized completion. Therefore the only safe approach is to submit '''all of these''' for one more round of Normative review. | Detailed review of the CMETs status, including the dates and results of prior reconciliation leave us with a singular conclusion. MnM must undertake to sponsor a Normative Ballot that includes all CMETs previously balloted (and '''mostly approved''') as Releases 3 through Release 9 -- everything since release 2. While the vast majority of these are "clean" (have no outstanding negatives), the package as a whole has gone too long without ANSI-recognized completion. Therefore the only safe approach is to submit '''all of these''' for one more round of Normative review. | ||
| Line 24: | Line 32: | ||
*a Zip archive of all relevant reconciliation packages | *a Zip archive of all relevant reconciliation packages | ||
| − | MnM | + | Concluded that MnM should approve a project proposal to this end, and the submission of an NIB for the September 2012 ballot. |
| + | ===Motion=== | ||
Andy Stechishin made motion to allow either: | Andy Stechishin made motion to allow either: | ||
#Accept responsibility for hosting and reconciling a composite CMET ballot as outlined above under Project 887 that the TSC sponsored for CMET management; or | #Accept responsibility for hosting and reconciling a composite CMET ballot as outlined above under Project 887 that the TSC sponsored for CMET management; or | ||
| Line 32: | Line 41: | ||
Second: Rob Hausam | Second: Rob Hausam | ||
| − | + | Unanimous | |
{{:MnM Action Items from 201005}} | {{:MnM Action Items from 201005}} | ||
==Adjournment== | ==Adjournment== | ||
Latest revision as of 20:41, 20 June 2012
M&M Conference Call 4:00PM Eastern Time (Date above)
Attendees
Beeler, Stechishin, Pech, Hamill, Hausam
Agenda
- Approve Minutes Prior Meeting on June 13
- CMETs Ballot Project Approval and of NIB
Business
- Approved agenda - Stechishin, Pech unanimous
- Amended then approved Minutes of June 13
CMETs Ballot Project Approval and of NIB
Status summary by Beeler, stechishin and Hamill:
Detailed review of the CMETs status, including the dates and results of prior reconciliation leave us with a singular conclusion. MnM must undertake to sponsor a Normative Ballot that includes all CMETs previously balloted (and mostly approved) as Releases 3 through Release 9 -- everything since release 2. While the vast majority of these are "clean" (have no outstanding negatives), the package as a whole has gone too long without ANSI-recognized completion. Therefore the only safe approach is to submit all of these for one more round of Normative review.
The balloting will include:
- Language making it clear that all CMETS in releases 1 & 2 that have not been altered are considered a part of release 4. (Thus obviating the need for reaffirmation)
- Include a listing for each CMET in the ballot showing whether it :
- has no negatives against it
- had negatives but those were reconciled; or
- have negatives that may still remain unreconciled (in which case, where possible, to list the negative
- a Zip archive of all relevant reconciliation packages
Concluded that MnM should approve a project proposal to this end, and the submission of an NIB for the September 2012 ballot.
Motion
Andy Stechishin made motion to allow either:
- Accept responsibility for hosting and reconciling a composite CMET ballot as outlined above under Project 887 that the TSC sponsored for CMET management; or
- Authorize submission to TSC of an MnM PSS, which project will undertake this ballot and then conclude.
Second: Rob Hausam
Unanimous
Review Action Items For MnM
Note the following list, and amend the list to assign selected items:
