This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "20120115 arb WGM SanAntonio minutes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Agenda) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[Category:Arb Minutes]] | [[Category:Arb Minutes]] | ||
=ArB Minutes = | =ArB Minutes = | ||
− | |||
=Detailed Agenda= | =Detailed Agenda= | ||
Click here for [[20120115_arb_WGM_SanAntonio_MAG| meeting-at-a-glance ]] | Click here for [[20120115_arb_WGM_SanAntonio_MAG| meeting-at-a-glance ]] |
Revision as of 15:57, 15 January 2012
DRAFT
ArB Minutes
Detailed Agenda
Click here for meeting-at-a-glance
- Sunday Q1
- Call to order
- Agenda and Minute approval
- Saif Canonical Ballot Reconcillation
- 19 comments
- 2 persuasive with mod
- 1 Persuasive
- 1 Considered- No action required
- 14 not related - an incorrect spreadsheet was uploaded by an affirmative balloter.
- Membership changes
- Glossary
- Next Steps
- Revisit Role
- Architecture Project
- FIM co-sponsorship
- OO project and Implications
- SOA representation
- Message representation
- Sunday Q2
- Call to order
- Substantivity:
- This comes up because there is no substantive(ity) definition for non-wire format documents
- A substantive change is one that changes the semantics of a given specification, i.e. representational changes should <<not>> be considered substantive in the context of the source specification itself <<unless>> such representational changes could substantively change down-stream derivative products of the specification, including either/both derivative semantics and/or derivative serializations or other wire-format-sensitive constructs.
- Sunday Q3
- Call to order
- V3 Substantive changes
- TBD
- Tuesday Q4
- Call to order
- TBD
- Wednesday Q1
- - Joint with SOA at SOA
- Thursday Q3
- Call to order
- TBD
- Thursday Q4
- Call to order
- Wrap up
- Agenda for future Telcons, etc.
Meeting Information
HL7 ArB Work Group Meeting Minutes Location: Telcon |
Date: 20120115 Time: 9:00Am U.S. Eastern | |||||
Facilitator | Ron Parker | Note taker(s) | Tony Julian | |||
Attendee | Name | Affiliation | ||||
X | Bond,Andy | NEHTA | ||||
X | Curry, Jane | Health Information Strategies | ||||
. | Grieve, Grahame | Kestral Computing | ||||
X | Hufnagel, Steve | U.S. Department of Defense, Military Health System | ||||
X | Julian, Tony | Mayo Clinic | ||||
. | Koisch, John | Guidewire Architecture | ||||
X | Loyd, Patrick | Gordon point Informatics LTD. | ||||
X | Lynch, Cecil | Accenture | ||||
. | Mead, Charlie | National Cancer Institute | ||||
X | Milosevic, Zoran | NEHTA | ||||
. | Ocasio, Wendell | Agilex Technologies | ||||
X | Parker, Ron | CA Infoway | ||||
. | Quinn, John | Health Level Seven, Inc. | ||||
. | Guests | |||||
. | Laskso, Lynn | HL7 Staff | ||||
. | Constable, Lorraine | HL7 Canada | ||||
Quorum Requirements Met: Yes |
Minutes
Detailed Agenda
Click here for meeting-at-a-glance
- Sunday Q1
- Call to order
- Agenda and Minute approval
- Motion Approve the agenda(Patrick/Jane)
- Vote (7-0-0)
- Saif Canonical Ballot Reconcillation
- 19 comments
- 2 persuasive with mod
- 1 Persuasive
- 1 Considered- No action required
- 14 not related - an incorrect spreadsheet was uploaded by an affirmative balloter.
- Motion to accept (Patrick/Jane)
- Vote 7-0-0
- Membership changes
- Patrick: Suggest addition of Lorraine Constable as she is involved in the OO project.
- Motion To add Lorraine (Patrick/Jane) (subject to approval by TSC).
- Vote (7-0-0)
- Patrick: Wish to remain on the ArB. Participation has been better.
- Grahame and John are not participating, and will step down.
- Current Membership: Patrick, Tony , Ron, Charlie, Andy, Zoran, Cecil, Jane, Steve, Lorraine, Bo Dagnal, Wendell
- Wiki profile page updates
- Logon to wiki
- Go to Special:ActiveUsers
- Find your name, and edit your user page
- Save!
- Glossary
- Next Steps
- Revisit Role
- Architecture Project
- FIM co-sponsorship
- OO project and Implications
- SOA representation
- Message representation
- Membership changes
- Sunday Q2
- Call to order
- Substantivity:
- This comes up because there is no substantive(ity) definition for non-wire format documents
- A substantive change is one that changes the semantics of a given specification, i.e. representational changes should <<not>> be considered substantive in the context of the source specification itself <<unless>> such representational changes could substantively change down-stream derivative products of the specification, including either/both derivative semantics and/or derivative serializations or other wire-format-sensitive constructs.
- Sunday Q3
- Call to order
- V3 Substantive changes
- TBD
- Tuesday Q4
- Call to order
- TBD
- Wednesday Q1
- - Joint with SOA at SOA
- Thursday Q3
- Call to order
- TBD
- Thursday Q4
- Call to order
- Wrap up
- Agenda for future Telcons, etc.
Tony Julian 17:28, 15 September 2011 (EDT)