This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "MnM Minutes CC 20110601"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 20: Line 20:
 
==Conference Call Planning==
 
==Conference Call Planning==
 
==Core Principles Ballot Reconciliation==
 
==Core Principles Ballot Reconciliation==
 +
During the Orlando Meeting, we "completed" MnM Ballot Reconciliation for COre Principles.  This included finding eight items from Microsoft as "Not Related" because the ballot spreadsheet submitted was '''identical''' to the one reconciled from the September 2010 Ballot.
 +
 +
Subsequent to that vote,
 +
# I talked to Kathleen O'Connor and determined that the '''primary concern''' from her voter was the "place holder" designation for sections 6.5 and 6.6, and that she had submitted the same spreadsheet because she was up against the deadline.
 +
# On further thought, I spoke to MnM Co-chairs in a subsequent meeting, and we agreed to place these two "place holder" summaries in the "Preface" (Notes to readers) where it will express intentions for the next release, rather than in the body of the document.
 +
 +
Therefore, I wish to amend the "Disposition Comment" for those three ballot line items (see below) and to seek a motion changing the Disposition from '''Not related''' to '''Persuasive with Mod'''.
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
  
 
{{:MnM Action Items from 201005}}
 
{{:MnM Action Items from 201005}}
  
 
==Adjournment==
 
==Adjournment==

Revision as of 16:12, 1 June 2011


M&M Conference Call 4:00PM Eastern Time (Date above)

Logistics

Join GoToMeeting at

https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/701832453
Meeting ID: 701-832-453

Return to MnM Minutes

Agenda

Approve Agenda and Minutes from Orlando WGM

Motion -

Conference Call Planning

Core Principles Ballot Reconciliation

During the Orlando Meeting, we "completed" MnM Ballot Reconciliation for COre Principles. This included finding eight items from Microsoft as "Not Related" because the ballot spreadsheet submitted was identical to the one reconciled from the September 2010 Ballot.

Subsequent to that vote,

  1. I talked to Kathleen O'Connor and determined that the primary concern from her voter was the "place holder" designation for sections 6.5 and 6.6, and that she had submitted the same spreadsheet because she was up against the deadline.
  2. On further thought, I spoke to MnM Co-chairs in a subsequent meeting, and we agreed to place these two "place holder" summaries in the "Preface" (Notes to readers) where it will express intentions for the next release, rather than in the body of the document.

Therefore, I wish to amend the "Disposition Comment" for those three ballot line items (see below) and to seek a motion changing the Disposition from Not related to Persuasive with Mod.






Review Action Items For MnM

Note the following list, and amend the list to assign selected items:

Adjournment