This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "March 22, 2011 CBCC Conference Call"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 28: Line 28:
 
It may be helpful to break the value set into about four - so that implementers are more likely to implement all aspects or can at least meaningfully claim which ones they implement.
 
It may be helpful to break the value set into about four - so that implementers are more likely to implement all aspects or can at least meaningfully claim which ones they implement.
  
1. “levels” (Low, normal, restricted, sensitive)
+
# “levels” (Low, normal, restricted, sensitive)
 
+
# “sensitivity content category” type or “rationale”  (PSY, HIV, SDV, VIP, Taboo) …. Segments
2. “sensitivity content category” type or “rationale”  (PSY, HIV, SDV, VIP, Taboo) …. Segments
+
# “role”(clinicians only) … RBAC roles
 
+
# “policy model” (individuals having treatment relationship to patient, as actor) – this is a “policy model”
3. “role”(clinicians only) … RBAC roles
 
 
 
4. “policy model” (individuals having treatment relationship to patient, as actor) – this is a “policy model”
 
  
 
#''(15 min)'' Request for items for [[May 2011 Working Group Meeting]] in Orlando, Florida.  Please contact [mailto:suzanne.l.gonzales-webb@saic.com Suzanne] to add to agenda
 
#''(15 min)'' Request for items for [[May 2011 Working Group Meeting]] in Orlando, Florida.  Please contact [mailto:suzanne.l.gonzales-webb@saic.com Suzanne] to add to agenda

Revision as of 18:46, 22 March 2011

Community-Based Collaborative Care Working Group Meeting

Back to CBCC Main Page

Meeting Information

Attendees

Agenda

  1. (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda
  2. (15 min) SHIPPs Update
  3. (15 min) NQF measure comments
  4. NEW PROJECT Proposal HL7 Confidentiality Codes - review and update
  5. (15 min) Confidentiality codes - topics for discussion in May 2011 meeting; preliminary discussion needed to structure - Mary Ann, Jon Farmer

Overview:

It may be helpful to break the value set into about four - so that implementers are more likely to implement all aspects or can at least meaningfully claim which ones they implement.

  1. “levels” (Low, normal, restricted, sensitive)
  2. “sensitivity content category” type or “rationale” (PSY, HIV, SDV, VIP, Taboo) …. Segments
  3. “role”(clinicians only) … RBAC roles
  4. “policy model” (individuals having treatment relationship to patient, as actor) – this is a “policy model”
  1. (15 min) Request for items for May 2011 Working Group Meeting in Orlando, Florida. Please contact Suzanne to add to agenda
  2. (5 min) Other Business


Back to CBCC Main Page