Difference between revisions of "November 16, 2010 CBCC Conference Call"
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
==2.a. Ballot Type == | ==2.a. Ballot Type == | ||
Draft for comment informative ballot or DSTU ballot | Draft for comment informative ballot or DSTU ballot | ||
+ | |||
+ | == 3. Sponsoring Group == | ||
+ | |||
+ | We don’t have a complete list of project participants; however we expect groups to identify themselves as they hear about the scope of the project. We will seek more involvement from other groups e.g. | ||
+ | *Public Health reporting | ||
+ | *The National Quality Forum may be interested in the performance and quality data that we are looking to record | ||
+ | We are expecting to make changes to the EHR functional model or functional profiles; we would like to enlist Jim Krentz from SAMSA to help submit these for consideration as enhancements to the EHR-S FM.. We expect the National Quality Forum (NQF) might also interested be as a co-sponsor, and we will reach out to Floyd Eisenberg (NQF) and the Structured Documents Work Group (Bob Dolin) to see if there is interest in collaboration. |
Revision as of 12:16, 24 November 2010
Community-Based Collaborative Care Working Group Meeting
Attendees
- Jon Farmer
- Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-chair
- Mary Ann Juurlink Scribe
- John Moehrke Security Co-chair
- Ioana Singureanu
- Richard Thoreson CBCC Co-chair
- Serafina Versaggi
- Tony Weida
- Craig Winter
Agenda
- (05 min) Roll call, approve minutes November 9th, call for additional agenda items & accept agenda
- (55 min) Draft Semantic Health Information Performance and Privacy Standard Project Scope Statement
Minutes
1. Action Items
2. Resolution
3. Updates/Discussion
Headline text
Review of HL7 Project Scope Statement Data Segmentation Pre-Requisites Preview of scope statement
The EHRS functional model working group is trying to match functions to content standards. The impetus of this scope statement is to improve data quality measures as well as to define missing functionality. This is required to support segmentation and privacy e.g. define automation for consent directive. Generally the first sections describes the art of HL7 balloting. We are expecting to;
- make changes to the EHR functional model e.g. some of the behavioural functional profiles that exist
- refine the DAM describing the health information for performance and privacy for data segmentation in particular
- refine vocabulary domain and value sets where they exists
2. Project Intent
The project intent is to revise and supplement current standards
2.a. Ballot Type
Draft for comment informative ballot or DSTU ballot
3. Sponsoring Group
We don’t have a complete list of project participants; however we expect groups to identify themselves as they hear about the scope of the project. We will seek more involvement from other groups e.g.
- Public Health reporting
- The National Quality Forum may be interested in the performance and quality data that we are looking to record
We are expecting to make changes to the EHR functional model or functional profiles; we would like to enlist Jim Krentz from SAMSA to help submit these for consideration as enhancements to the EHR-S FM.. We expect the National Quality Forum (NQF) might also interested be as a co-sponsor, and we will reach out to Floyd Eisenberg (NQF) and the Structured Documents Work Group (Bob Dolin) to see if there is interest in collaboration.