Difference between revisions of "V3 Publishing ConCall Minutes 20100331"
Astechishin (talk | contribs) (New page: :Return to Publishing Committee :Minutes of Recent Publishing Conference Calls ==Wednesday, March 31, 2010 -- 4:00 PM Easter...) |
Astechishin (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Present== | ==Present== | ||
| − | + | Beeler (GWB), Kreisler (AK), Lloyd (DL), Seppala (GS), Stechishin (AS), Walden (AW) | |
==Agenda== | ==Agenda== | ||
| − | Add quality review | + | Add quality review description to agenda items |
===Call to order at 4:05=== | ===Call to order at 4:05=== | ||
===Review Minutes of March 24, 2010=== | ===Review Minutes of March 24, 2010=== | ||
| − | + | Not done | |
| − | === | + | ===Notes from Don Lloyd=== |
| − | issues with accessing preview site, wiki, main site | + | There were issues reported with accessing preview site, wiki, and the main site |
| − | |||
*AW had problems getting ballot site, will review to get content fixed | *AW had problems getting ballot site, will review to get content fixed | ||
| − | in contact with people | + | DL in contact with people who have issues |
===QA reports=== | ===QA reports=== | ||
| − | make it possible for DL to run QA report | + | GWB: make it possible for DL to run QA report without going back to PubDb environment |
| − | series of | + | There is a series of tests, results link points to actual results, rest of the QA report in mainly boilerplate. |
| − | wrestle with missing static models, content where no | + | There was a wrestle with missing static models, content where no static model file but reference in the PubDB |
| − | down to handful (did have 100s) | + | Currently down to handful of errors (did have 100s) |
| − | + | One major change to the generator, GWB is about to pass to DL. Generator no longer requires ballot status to be updated in the PubDB, does a lookup against domain. | |
| − | + | Preview test and report will almost completely predict where schema will fail to validate. | |
What to try to do? | What to try to do? | ||
* classify error into 2 categories, flag with other field or colour, fatal error in schema or MIF content | * classify error into 2 categories, flag with other field or colour, fatal error in schema or MIF content | ||
| − | + | AK: part says perfect, but reasonable? | |
| − | + | GWB: 2 directories? valid/invalid | |
Identified GS issues from some 2 weeks back with X_ domains versus value set | Identified GS issues from some 2 weeks back with X_ domains versus value set | ||
| Line 43: | Line 42: | ||
AK: can we put link to report at beginning of domain, annex some jiggery to make a standard TOC entry (and lhs menu item) | AK: can we put link to report at beginning of domain, annex some jiggery to make a standard TOC entry (and lhs menu item) | ||
| − | + | ||
AK: ballot comment reuest fix errors | AK: ballot comment reuest fix errors | ||
GWB: need to code difference between significant | GWB: need to code difference between significant | ||
Revision as of 19:41, 7 April 2010
Contents
Wednesday, March 31, 2010 -- 4:00 PM Eastern
Present
Beeler (GWB), Kreisler (AK), Lloyd (DL), Seppala (GS), Stechishin (AS), Walden (AW)
Agenda
Add quality review description to agenda items
Call to order at 4:05
Review Minutes of March 24, 2010
Not done
Notes from Don Lloyd
There were issues reported with accessing preview site, wiki, and the main site
- AW had problems getting ballot site, will review to get content fixed
DL in contact with people who have issues
QA reports
GWB: make it possible for DL to run QA report without going back to PubDb environment
There is a series of tests, results link points to actual results, rest of the QA report in mainly boilerplate.
There was a wrestle with missing static models, content where no static model file but reference in the PubDB
Currently down to handful of errors (did have 100s)
One major change to the generator, GWB is about to pass to DL. Generator no longer requires ballot status to be updated in the PubDB, does a lookup against domain.
Preview test and report will almost completely predict where schema will fail to validate.
What to try to do?
- classify error into 2 categories, flag with other field or colour, fatal error in schema or MIF content
AK: part says perfect, but reasonable? GWB: 2 directories? valid/invalid
Identified GS issues from some 2 weeks back with X_ domains versus value set
- GS RMIM did not show it as error
some Scheduling SC interaction errors showed up GS: not active
AK: can we put link to report at beginning of domain, annex some jiggery to make a standard TOC entry (and lhs menu item)
AK: ballot comment reuest fix errors GWB: need to code difference between significant
agenda for T3SD participate in Harmon, talk on Q/A
ak: petition for neg vote with q/a
gwb: propose process to cast neg ballot (change to bylaws) pub, and committee (MnM, InM, Vocab, ITS)
DL
heard from Josh, slow down, known issue
