This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "March 30th, 2010 Security Conference Call"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 35: Line 35:
 
#''(05 min)'' Roll Call, Approve Minutes '''(To Be Posted Soon)''' & Accept Agenda
 
#''(05 min)'' Roll Call, Approve Minutes '''(To Be Posted Soon)''' & Accept Agenda
 
#''(45 min)'' '''Update of Ongoing Projects'''
 
#''(45 min)'' '''Update of Ongoing Projects'''
## Security and Privacy Ontology Project
+
## Security and Privacy Ontology Project - (Mike) true version can be found on GForge.  Will be discussed at next TSC meeting.  Discussion at TSC meeting on which ontology to use. Some termoniolgy models in the current DAM that might provide discussion.  The terminologists may propose a process to move forward to include Berndt and Cecil and develop the requirements for the ontology effort.
 +
(Steve) have been listenting to the SOA ontology and they have been favoring Protege ontology tool (as well as '''BFO''' as upper level ontology).  We should keep aware of the status of this as it is preferred we stay in line with SOA.
 
## Security and Privacy DAM '''[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/frsrelease/635/7044/PeerReview__PublicCommentsConsolidated16Mar20100.DOC Harmonized Security and Privacy DAM Consolidated Peer Review Comments]'''
 
## Security and Privacy DAM '''[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/frsrelease/635/7044/PeerReview__PublicCommentsConsolidated16Mar20100.DOC Harmonized Security and Privacy DAM Consolidated Peer Review Comments]'''
 
#''(5 min)'' '''Other Business'''
 
#''(5 min)'' '''Other Business'''

Revision as of 17:17, 30 March 2010

Security Working Group Meeting

Back to Security Main Page

==Attendees== (expected)

Back to Security Main Page


Agenda

  1. (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Minutes (To Be Posted Soon) & Accept Agenda
  2. (45 min) Update of Ongoing Projects
    1. Security and Privacy Ontology Project - (Mike) true version can be found on GForge. Will be discussed at next TSC meeting. Discussion at TSC meeting on which ontology to use. Some termoniolgy models in the current DAM that might provide discussion. The terminologists may propose a process to move forward to include Berndt and Cecil and develop the requirements for the ontology effort.

(Steve) have been listenting to the SOA ontology and they have been favoring Protege ontology tool (as well as BFO as upper level ontology). We should keep aware of the status of this as it is preferred we stay in line with SOA.

    1. Security and Privacy DAM Harmonized Security and Privacy DAM Consolidated Peer Review Comments
  1. (5 min) Other Business

Action Items

Back to Security Main Page