This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "February 9th 2010 Security Conference Call"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 31: Line 31:
 
#''(5 min)'' RBAC Ballot Reconciliation status
 
#''(5 min)'' RBAC Ballot Reconciliation status
 
#''(10 min)'' SAEAF Alpha project question
 
#''(10 min)'' SAEAF Alpha project question
#*When is it appropriate to use the RIM in a Security Privacy domain
+
#*When is it appropriate to use the RIM in a Security Privacy domain?
 
#''(15 min)'' Security and CBCC WG response to [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/5459/6897/HHSMU_Standards1IFR.pdf Meaningful Use IFR]
 
#''(15 min)'' Security and CBCC WG response to [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/5459/6897/HHSMU_Standards1IFR.pdf Meaningful Use IFR]
 
#*Discussion
 
#*Discussion

Revision as of 21:12, 10 February 2010

Security Work Group Weekly Conference Call

Meeting Information

Attendees

Agenda

Agenda includes time allocated to the CBCC Call

  1. (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Minutes Feb 2, 2010 & Call for Additional Agenda Items
  2. (30 min) Security and Privacy Ontology project status
  3. (25 min) Security Domain Analysis Model project status
  4. (5 min) RBAC Ballot Reconciliation status
  5. (10 min) SAEAF Alpha project question
    • When is it appropriate to use the RIM in a Security Privacy domain?
  6. (15 min) Security and CBCC WG response to Meaningful Use IFR
    • Discussion
    • No link to submit comments electronically on the HL7.org homepage as yet
    • Comments can be emailed directly to Karen Van Hentenryck
  7. (5 min) FYI: Topics for future WG meeting
    • Security Risk Assessment
      • A number of WG members missed the presentation John gave at the Phoenix WGM
    • Privacy Templates Scope Statement

Ontologies presentation from the Phoenix WGM :

Minutes

1. Action Items

2. Resolutions

3. Announcements

4. Updates/Discussion