This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Create proposal related to use of Headers instead of Wrappers"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*20070618: Telcon: Doug will talk to Charlie | *20070618: Telcon: Doug will talk to Charlie | ||
*20080114:WGM:Scott will ping Charlie | *20080114:WGM:Scott will ping Charlie | ||
+ | *20100112:Charlie:** again abandoned with guilt – suggest that someone who has an immediate and pressing interest in specifying the use of attachments pick this up – I can see that there is something useful to be done here, but again I do not want to be a bottleneck to letting it happen. If no-one is available to pick it up now, then I suggest that the action be closed rather than maintain an expectation that I will write something up. |
Revision as of 18:39, 12 January 2010
This is a page of type Category:InM Open Action Items.
Create proposal related to use of Headers instead of Wrappers
Opened 2007-01-11 Assigned to: Patrick Loyd Old action item 1133
- Status updated 20100112 ajulian
Create proposal related to use of Headers instead of Wrappers, related to BehaviorialContract wrapper.
- Charlie McCay, new, 20070111
- During discussion Charlie thought an alternative approach, suing Headers (siblings) instead of Wrappers (parent/child). The INM committee would like to see a proposal related to this before making any motions.
- 20070502: WGM: Open for now, probably subsumed by Wrappers R2.
- 20070618: Telcon: Doug will talk to Charlie
- 20080114:WGM:Scott will ping Charlie
- 20100112:Charlie:** again abandoned with guilt – suggest that someone who has an immediate and pressing interest in specifying the use of attachments pick this up – I can see that there is something useful to be done here, but again I do not want to be a bottleneck to letting it happen. If no-one is available to pick it up now, then I suggest that the action be closed rather than maintain an expectation that I will write something up.