This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "INM SWOT"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: DRAFT, October 30, 2009 * Strengths Very knowledgeable participants Well-known and well-used Standards * Weaknesses Lack of regular participation Lack of resourcing to work with other gr...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
DRAFT, October 30, 2009
 
DRAFT, October 30, 2009
  
* Strengths
+
*Strengths
Very knowledgeable participants
+
**Very knowledgeable participants
Well-known and well-used Standards
+
**Well-known and well-used Standards
  
 
* Weaknesses
 
* Weaknesses
Lack of regular participation
+
**Lack of regular participation
Lack of resourcing to work with other groups or new work items
+
**Lack of resourcing to work with other groups or new work items
Scope of WG is narrow
+
**Scope of WG is narrow
Need for new standards is not uniform.  There are a couple of efforts in other HL7 WGs which will need either modified or new INM standards which have not been resourced.  One project needs additional work with batch.  Another project(s) are working on services (which will also affect the current INM standards).
+
**Need for new standards is not uniform.  There are a couple of efforts in other HL7 WGs which will need either modified or new INM standards which have not been resourced.  One project needs additional work with batch.  Another project(s) are working on services (which will also affect the current INM standards).
  
 
* Opportunities
 
* Opportunities
Wrappers R2 will be a chance to re-engage all interested parties
+
**Wrappers R2 will be a chance to re-engage all interested parties
  
 
* Threats
 
* Threats
Limited participation
+
**Limited participation

Revision as of 16:36, 30 October 2009

DRAFT, October 30, 2009

  • Strengths
    • Very knowledgeable participants
    • Well-known and well-used Standards
  • Weaknesses
    • Lack of regular participation
    • Lack of resourcing to work with other groups or new work items
    • Scope of WG is narrow
    • Need for new standards is not uniform. There are a couple of efforts in other HL7 WGs which will need either modified or new INM standards which have not been resourced. One project needs additional work with batch. Another project(s) are working on services (which will also affect the current INM standards).
  • Opportunities
    • Wrappers R2 will be a chance to re-engage all interested parties
  • Threats
    • Limited participation