Difference between revisions of "Conformance 15th March"
Frankoemig (talk | contribs) |
Frankoemig (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Participants | + | '''Participants''' |
* John Lyons | * John Lyons | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* Charlie McCay | * Charlie McCay | ||
| − | Planned Topics | + | '''Planned Topics''' |
* Data Type Flavors | * Data Type Flavors | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
'''Data Type Flavors''' | '''Data Type Flavors''' | ||
| − | Charlie has sent a document about data type flavors to the conformance list server. | + | Charlie has sent a document about data type flavors to the conformance list server. Charlie wants to present the rendered document sharing his desktop screen via a websession. But this does not work. |
| + | |||
| + | One of the main questions is whether this content should be added or not. From its current status it is not fully harmonized with MnM. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Motion by Paul: Want to see what Charlie has added to this document, so bring it to ballot! (Paul+Charlie) 5:0:0 | ||
| + | |||
| + | Motion: Proposal to bring it to 5.3.1 and to put a reference to the end of 2.4.1 ( "In addition to the normative datatypes, further datatype specialisations may be defined and used to express further constraints on the permitted content of HL7 attributes. The way that such specialisations are defined and used is discussed in section 5.3.1 below."). (Len+John) 5:0:0 | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Ballot Submissions''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Paul is fine with the current the version of the document. Only some minors changes must be done. But that can be done later. | ||
Revision as of 20:26, 15 March 2006
Participants
- John Lyons
- Paul Biron
- Len Gallagher
- Frank Oemig
- Charlie McCay
Planned Topics
- Data Type Flavors
- Ballot Submission
- ...
Data Type Flavors
Charlie has sent a document about data type flavors to the conformance list server. Charlie wants to present the rendered document sharing his desktop screen via a websession. But this does not work.
One of the main questions is whether this content should be added or not. From its current status it is not fully harmonized with MnM.
Motion by Paul: Want to see what Charlie has added to this document, so bring it to ballot! (Paul+Charlie) 5:0:0
Motion: Proposal to bring it to 5.3.1 and to put a reference to the end of 2.4.1 ( "In addition to the normative datatypes, further datatype specialisations may be defined and used to express further constraints on the permitted content of HL7 attributes. The way that such specialisations are defined and used is discussed in section 5.3.1 below."). (Len+John) 5:0:0
Ballot Submissions
Paul is fine with the current the version of the document. Only some minors changes must be done. But that can be done later.
