This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "EHR Interop - CDA R3 - Access Control"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 19: Line 19:
 
=Rationale=
 
=Rationale=
  
Possibly the best way to establish and persist permissions/authorizations is to embed access control notations in each document instance (when applicable).  This access control request is embedded at request of document subject (e.g., patient), author or source organization and is carried out (honored) by each downstream document recipient.
+
Possibly the best way to establish and persist permissions/authorizations is to embed access control notations in each document instance (when applicable).  Access control parameters are embedded and persisted at request of document subject (e.g., patient), author or source organization and are carried out (honored) by each downstream document recipient.
  
 
=Discussion=
 
=Discussion=

Revision as of 17:30, 1 October 2009


Submitted by: HL7 EHR Interoperability WG - Gary Dickinson Revision date: 1 October 2009

Submitted date: 1 October 2009 Change request ID: <<Change Request ID>>

Contents

Issue

Allow Access Permissions/Authorizations in CDA R3 Instances

Recommendation

Embed access controls specific to: individuals or roles

Embed access controls to: entire document content, section content, template content, discrete attribute content

Rationale

Possibly the best way to establish and persist permissions/authorizations is to embed access control notations in each document instance (when applicable). Access control parameters are embedded and persisted at request of document subject (e.g., patient), author or source organization and are carried out (honored) by each downstream document recipient.

Discussion

Recommended Action Items

Resolution

(Resolution is to be recorded here and in the referenced minutes, which are the authoritative source of resolution).