This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "MnM Minutes CC 20090313"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: =M&M Conference Call Noon Eastern Time (Date above)= ==Attendance== * Woody Beeler * Austin Kreisler * Brandon Ulrich * Lloyd McKenzie (chair) * Dale Nelson (scribe) * Han Nguyen * Ioana S...) |
|||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
==Agenda== | ==Agenda== | ||
* Graphical Representation of RMIMs | * Graphical Representation of RMIMs | ||
| + | |||
==Minutes== | ==Minutes== | ||
| + | LM: Questions to decide | ||
| + | 1) Should HL7 support mulitple graphic formats for publishing diagrams | ||
| + | * 1 format (earlier HL7 decisions) | ||
| + | * 1 format, but allow for alternates (every SM will support a common format, but may use others) | ||
| + | * multiple formats (different committeess can represent as they see fit) | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2) Which graphical format(s) should HL7 approve? | ||
| + | |||
| + | GB: Presented discussion of findings of differences between representations of features | ||
| + | * Structural attributes (classCode, moodCode) are not complete in SMD, missing in UML | ||
| + | * UML represents participations as association classes; | ||
| + | * Mandatory specification of attrs absent in UML | ||
| + | |||
| + | Started w/ Rose, found that it was not expressive enough for needs. | ||
| + | |||
| + | MW: Preference for single representation. Either representation is OK, SMD looks close to current Visio | ||
| + | IS: Agree, info s.b. on diagram, but s.b. able to hide some info | ||
| + | LM: May be a desire to render differently for different audiences. Near term, single rendering is probable. | ||
| + | |||
Revision as of 16:51, 13 March 2009
M&M Conference Call Noon Eastern Time (Date above)
Attendance
- Woody Beeler
- Austin Kreisler
- Brandon Ulrich
- Lloyd McKenzie (chair)
- Dale Nelson (scribe)
- Han Nguyen
- Ioana Singureanu
- Scott Robertson
- Leslie Flaherty
- Adeola Odunlami
- Adam Flinton
- Ravi Natarajan
- Andy Stechishin
- Bernard Jackson
- Dave Carlson
- Gregg Seppala
- Galen Mulrooney
- Tim Ireland
- Mead Walker
Agenda
- Graphical Representation of RMIMs
Minutes
LM: Questions to decide 1) Should HL7 support mulitple graphic formats for publishing diagrams
- 1 format (earlier HL7 decisions)
- 1 format, but allow for alternates (every SM will support a common format, but may use others)
- multiple formats (different committeess can represent as they see fit)
2) Which graphical format(s) should HL7 approve?
GB: Presented discussion of findings of differences between representations of features
- Structural attributes (classCode, moodCode) are not complete in SMD, missing in UML
- UML represents participations as association classes;
- Mandatory specification of attrs absent in UML
Started w/ Rose, found that it was not expressive enough for needs.
MW: Preference for single representation. Either representation is OK, SMD looks close to current Visio IS: Agree, info s.b. on diagram, but s.b. able to hide some info LM: May be a desire to render differently for different audiences. Near term, single rendering is probable.
