This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "November 6, 2018 Security Conference Call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | || | + | || x|| [mailto:Diana.Proud-Madruga@electro-soft.com Diana Proud-Madruga] |
||||.|| [mailto:jc@securityrs.com Johnathan Coleman] | ||||.|| [mailto:jc@securityrs.com Johnathan Coleman] | ||
||||.|| [mailto:fjaureui@electrosoft-inc.com Francisco Jauregui] | ||||.|| [mailto:fjaureui@electrosoft-inc.com Francisco Jauregui] | ||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
Discussion/ updates to be made - add count to vote under DS4P | Discussion/ updates to be made - add count to vote under DS4P | ||
(Suzanne / Joe L) | (Suzanne / Joe L) | ||
− | + | Objection: none; Abstain: none Approval: 8 | |
'''PASS AUDIT Revision''' | '''PASS AUDIT Revision''' | ||
− | * | + | * Unknown if ballot reconciliation sheet was ever uploaded to ballot site |
− | ** | + | ** If it hasn't, it needs to (Mike/Diana/Kathleen - need to decide plan of action to review) |
− | ** | + | ** Unsure if withdrawals have been requested |
− | * | + | * Approximately 50 of the comments had been addressed; to the best of knowledge nothing has been done since then |
** DaveS - thought Mike had said that reconciliation is done is to request to withdraw negative votes | ** DaveS - thought Mike had said that reconciliation is done is to request to withdraw negative votes | ||
**Kathleen's understanding was we were waiting on updates to the document | **Kathleen's understanding was we were waiting on updates to the document | ||
Harmonization proposals - tonight is final proposals nneed to be in | Harmonization proposals - tonight is final proposals nneed to be in | ||
− | * | + | * We have reviewed them all earlier |
− | ** | + | ** Additional CUIs need to be added per Kathleen (specific to the portion marking in the ''print name'' code |
− | *** | + | *** Only a slight variation/change is needed to correct |
− | ** | + | ** Reviewed a spreadsheet instead of word document |
− | **banners do not have parenthesis around them, but when you go to the portion marking, there are and a differnt CUI marking is needed) as shown under 'Marking Multiple Pages' | + | ** It was noted that banners do not have parenthesis around them, but when you go to the portion marking, there are and a differnt CUI marking is needed) as shown under 'Marking Multiple Pages' |
− | * | + | * Additional issue - |
** under RoseTree, xml used in version 3 if you look at code system; under _ActCodeSystem | ** under RoseTree, xml used in version 3 if you look at code system; under _ActCodeSystem | ||
***SecurityPolicy(security Polcy) | ***SecurityPolicy(security Polcy) | ||
Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
Proposal has been reviewed by co-sponsor Patient Administration - they have reviewed the presented and final. | Proposal has been reviewed by co-sponsor Patient Administration - they have reviewed the presented and final. | ||
− | Motion to | + | * VOTE: Motion to approve Harmonization Proposal as presented (Suzanne/Theresa) ''with addition of CUI changes'' |
− | Opposed: none: abstention: none; | + | ** Opposed: none: abstention: none; Approve: 8 |
− | Kathleen will submit today (tonight) with additional CUI changes | + | ** Kathleen will submit today (tonight) with additional CUI changes |
− | + | '''GDPR White Paper''' | |
− | Peter started discussion with POU which fits very nicely with current POU | + | * Low attendance, would like more people from EU |
− | *there is a difference in POU and purpose of processing | + | * Peter started discussion with POU which fits very nicely with current POU vocabulary definition |
− | ** Peter is currently working (in company for | + | * Agreement during meeting that there is a difference in POU and purpose of processing |
+ | ** Peter is currently working (in company for proposal) for possible codes to better define purpose of processing | ||
* Peter is trying to mesh of POU in Europe - some of the items do not make sense when applied to purpose of processing; based on purpose i.e. law, xx or xx (is this policy?) | * Peter is trying to mesh of POU in Europe - some of the items do not make sense when applied to purpose of processing; based on purpose i.e. law, xx or xx (is this policy?) | ||
* (Kathleen) There is abranch that is not healthcare specific which may be helpful to look at | * (Kathleen) There is abranch that is not healthcare specific which may be helpful to look at | ||
Line 103: | Line 104: | ||
Connectathon | Connectathon | ||
− | * | + | * Note: MiHIN is willing to join in the Montréal Connectathon |
* finished storyboard in June, people involved in SLS, consent will also be involved in January and in May. | * finished storyboard in June, people involved in SLS, consent will also be involved in January and in May. | ||
Revision as of 18:34, 13 November 2018
Attendees
x | Member Name | x | Member Name | x | Member Name | x | Member Name | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x | John Moehrke Security Co-chair | x | Kathleen Connor Security Co-chair | x | Alexander Mense Security Co-chair | . | Trish Williams Security Co-chair | |||
x | Christopher Shawn Security Co-chair | x | Suzanne Gonzales-Webb | x | Mike Davis | . | David Staggs | |||
x | Diana Proud-Madruga | . | Johnathan Coleman | . | Francisco Jauregui | . | Joe Lamy | |||
. | Theresa Ardal Connor | . | Greg Linden | . | Grahame Grieve | . | Dave Silver | |||
. | Beth Pumo | x | Jim Kretz | . | Peter Bachman | . | Bo Dagnall |
Agenda
- (2 min) Roll Call, Agenda Approval
- (2 min) Review and Approval of Minutes October 30, 2018
- (2 min) Update on revision of PASS Audit - reconcilation is ready for upload - Mike
- (30 min) Review of Final Security Harmonization proposals
- Submission deadline at 12AM ET 11/6. Harmonization meeting scheduled for 11/8 & 11/9 from 12PM to 6PM ET.
- Policy Vocabulary spreadsheet
- Policy proposal
- Adding the v3 Policy codes to HL7 v2 Table 0717 for security labeling
- (5 min) GDPR whitepaper on FHIR Update - Alex
- No FHIR Security call update - John sends his regrets
Meeting Minutes
Meeting Chair - Kathleen
Meeting Minute approval for 10/30 Discussion/ updates to be made - add count to vote under DS4P (Suzanne / Joe L) Objection: none; Abstain: none Approval: 8
PASS AUDIT Revision
- Unknown if ballot reconciliation sheet was ever uploaded to ballot site
- If it hasn't, it needs to (Mike/Diana/Kathleen - need to decide plan of action to review)
- Unsure if withdrawals have been requested
- Approximately 50 of the comments had been addressed; to the best of knowledge nothing has been done since then
- DaveS - thought Mike had said that reconciliation is done is to request to withdraw negative votes
- Kathleen's understanding was we were waiting on updates to the document
Harmonization proposals - tonight is final proposals nneed to be in
- We have reviewed them all earlier
- Additional CUIs need to be added per Kathleen (specific to the portion marking in the print name code
- Only a slight variation/change is needed to correct
- Reviewed a spreadsheet instead of word document
- It was noted that banners do not have parenthesis around them, but when you go to the portion marking, there are and a differnt CUI marking is needed) as shown under 'Marking Multiple Pages'
- Additional CUIs need to be added per Kathleen (specific to the portion marking in the print name code
- Additional issue -
- under RoseTree, xml used in version 3 if you look at code system; under _ActCodeSystem
- SecurityPolicy(security Polcy)
- adding privacy marker; one for CUI, second for security labeling mark - alked about last week. These are marks that you display which may be in the descritipn (i.e. confidential, high water mark; 42CFR42, etc)
- under RoseTree, xml used in version 3 if you look at code system; under _ActCodeSystem
<<add link to harmonization proposal>> Proposal has been reviewed by co-sponsor Patient Administration - they have reviewed the presented and final.
- VOTE: Motion to approve Harmonization Proposal as presented (Suzanne/Theresa) with addition of CUI changes
- Opposed: none: abstention: none; Approve: 8
- Kathleen will submit today (tonight) with additional CUI changes
GDPR White Paper
- Low attendance, would like more people from EU
- Peter started discussion with POU which fits very nicely with current POU vocabulary definition
- Agreement during meeting that there is a difference in POU and purpose of processing
- Peter is currently working (in company for proposal) for possible codes to better define purpose of processing
- Peter is trying to mesh of POU in Europe - some of the items do not make sense when applied to purpose of processing; based on purpose i.e. law, xx or xx (is this policy?)
- (Kathleen) There is abranch that is not healthcare specific which may be helpful to look at
- Peter ) something they need
next GDPR call in two weeks - we will dsicss proposal; come up with harmonized list and send out to Security and European group to spread out to their organizations and get feeback
- one of the use cases will be from national summary? (from Giorgio)
- one will be from John...(add description) care plan, care plan track
- next call on NOvember 19 - at noon Eastern on Monday
Connectathon
- Note: MiHIN is willing to join in the Montréal Connectathon
- finished storyboard in June, people involved in SLS, consent will also be involved in January and in May.
Meeting adjorned at 1:44 Arizona Time --Suzannegw (talk) 15:46, 6 November 2018 (EST) https://fccdl.in/q8Ci7x2ZYP