This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "2018-11-07 SGB Conference Call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
| || Russ Hamm | | || Russ Hamm | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Tony Julian | + | |Regrets || Tony Julian |
|- | |- | ||
| || Paul Knapp | | || Paul Knapp | ||
Revision as of 15:01, 7 November 2018
back to Standards Governance Board main page
| HL7 SGB Minutes |
Date: 2018-MM-DD Time: 10:00 AM Eastern | ||
| Facilitator | Paul/Lorraine | Note taker(s) | Anne |
| Attendee | Name
| ||
| Regrets | Calvin Beebe | ||
| Lorraine Constable | |||
| Russ Hamm | |||
| Regrets | Tony Julian | ||
| Paul Knapp | |||
| Ewout Kramer | |||
| Regrets | Austin Kreisler | ||
| Wayne Kubick | |||
| Thom Kuhn | |||
| Ken McCaslin | |||
| Rik Smithies | |||
| Sandy Stuart | |||
| Quorum: Chair + 4 | |||
Agenda
- Agenda review
- Approve Minutes of 2018-10-31_SGB_Conference_Call
- Action Items
- Paul to contact PA re: approval items balloting at STU in FHIR R3
- Will then verify with Karen that the documentation on the FHIR R3 ballot STU approvals is sufficient
- Paul to ask PH for clarification on the status of items taken out of tracker and then reconciled on spreadsheet/ask for a plan for addressing the issue
- Paul to draft precept on artifact governance
- Wayne to reach out to Argonaut project leads re: Argonaut diagnostic report development (from 2018-10-05 WGM meeting)
- Anne to work with Josh to set up SGB page to communicate decisions/precepts by January
- Austin to discuss separation of concerns issue with Lloyd (from 2018-10-24 call)
- Group to review Project Life Cycle for Product Development (PLCPD) document and add to agenda for 2018-11-14 call (from 2018-10-31 Call)
- Wayne to compare CDAMG resppointments against the preponderance of influence reporting system (from 2018-10-31 Call)
- Paul to contact PA re: approval items balloting at STU in FHIR R3
- Discussion Topics
- CDAMG reappointments
- Issues and risks around balloted vs. non-balloted feedback in FHIR from different perspectives
- Continued discussion: Currency of Value Set Content
- SGB Communication Plan
- Updates that we do to newer versions of FHIR that are also applicable to older versions
- Precepts We Need to Develop
- Parking Lot
- Mapping coordination
- Add link to Confluence page from ARB page
- Review of product management life cycle spec to see if it talks about project and ballot scope
- Review of MG responses to SGB query on substantive change
- Need to make sure that SGB is accurately reflected in the GOM, and figure out what precepts should appear in the GOM
- Review Mission and Charter
- Drafting Shared Product Management Responsibilities
- Technical Alignments Between Product Families
- How groups are to interact with publishing, EST, Vocabulary, etc.
- Precept on bringing in large projects
- Vocabulary - review HTA material for precepts
- Precept for adding new tools (include that WGs with a specific mandate must be involved, such as EST, Publishing, Vocabulary, etc.) - was this covered by the tooling precept we created in New Orleans?
- BAM guidance on process for product adoption
- Create PRECEPTS that require that it be articulated in the standards how the value sets specified within the standards respond to changes in regulation, licensing, time, etc.- to do in April/before Cologne
- FHIR Product Director Position Description: we should 1) review further and draft feedback, then 2) map back the description to the role of FGB
- Ownership of content
- What precepts do we need to address PSS/profile approval processes of balloting and publishing potentially thousands of CIMI model?
Minutes
Meeting Outcomes
| Actions
|
| Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2018 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved
