This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Negation Requirements Project Minutes 5 September 2018"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 122: | Line 122: | ||
#### Refute a rule-out or suspected problem (verification status) | #### Refute a rule-out or suspected problem (verification status) | ||
#### Resolve a problem (clinical status) | #### Resolve a problem (clinical status) | ||
− | #### Some are just protocol questions: not pregnant, no night sweats | + | #### Some are just protocol questions: not pregnant, no night sweats. |
+ | ##### these are observations, not conditions. There doesn't seem to be a lot of need for specific negation of conditions. | ||
#### Use case: if CCDA contains "diabetes" negated, then what? | #### Use case: if CCDA contains "diabetes" negated, then what? | ||
##### How often does this happen? | ##### How often does this happen? |
Revision as of 20:55, 5 September 2018
Back to Negation Minutes
Minutes
Meeting Information
HL7 PC-CIMI-POC Meeting Minutes Location: PC call line |
Date: 2018-09-05 Time: 4:00-5:00 PM ET | ||
Facilitator | Jay Lyle | Note taker(s) | Jay Lyle |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation
| |
y | Jay Lyle | JP Systems | |
y | Yanyan Hu | Joint Commission | |
y | Senthil Nachimuthu | 3M | |
y | Ken Lord | VA | |
y | Rob Hausam | IMO | |
Ben Hamlin | NCQA | ||
Lisa Nelson | |||
Emma Jones | Allscripts | ||
George Dixon | Allscripts | ||
Michelle Miller | Cerner | ||
Michael Padula | Cerner | ||
Stephen Chu | Joint Commission | ||
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- review
- Problem
Minutes
- Problem
- No problems: CDA negated 'problem' = FHIR code "no problems". This seems unproblematic.
- CDA can negate a specific problem
- FHIR can negate a specific problem if there is a specific code (Diabetic retinopathy of eye not detected (situation))
- Usually, there is a reason
- Refute a rule-out or suspected problem (verification status)
- Resolve a problem (clinical status)
- Some are just protocol questions: not pregnant, no night sweats.
- these are observations, not conditions. There doesn't seem to be a lot of need for specific negation of conditions.
- Use case: if CCDA contains "diabetes" negated, then what?
- How often does this happen?
- Engine needs to specify assumptions, e.g.,
- if it's a negated condition, it's not a condition; drop it, or
- only send negated conditions with histories that tell us whether to tag it as Resolved or Refuted
- next week
- Ken: no physical impairment
- Jay: no problems
Meeting Outcomes
Actions
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items Agenda for 8/22:
|
© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.