This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "2018-08-22 SGB Conference Call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 150: | Line 150: | ||
|width="100%" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/> | |width="100%" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/> | ||
− | *[[2018- | + | *[[2018-08-29 SGB Conference Call]] |
|} | |} | ||
© 2018 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved | © 2018 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved |
Revision as of 13:58, 22 August 2018
back to Standards Governance Board main page
HL7 SGB Minutes |
Date: 2018-08-22 Time: 10:00 AM Eastern | ||
Facilitator | Paul/Lorraine | Note taker(s) | Anne |
Attendee | Name
| ||
Calvin Beebe | |||
Lorraine Constable | |||
Russ Hamm | |||
Tony Julian | |||
Paul Knapp | |||
Ewout Kramer | |||
Austin Kreisler | |||
Wayne Kubick | |||
Thom Kuhn | |||
Ken McCaslin | |||
Rik Smithies | |||
Sandy Stuart | |||
Quorum: Chair + 4 |
Agenda
- Agenda review
- Approve Minutes of 2018-08-15_SGB_Conference_Call
- Action Items
- Paul to contact Vocab/PA re: approval items balloting at STU in FHIR R3
- Will then verify with Karen that the documentation on the FHIR R3 ballot STU approvals is sufficient
- Paul to ask PH for clarification on the status of items taken out of tracker and then reconciled on spreadsheet/ask for a plan for addressing the issue
- Paul to draft precept on artifact governance
- Paul/Austin to draft survey for methodology cochairs regarding desire for model-driven approach where a RDAM sits at the top
- Paul to contact Vocab/PA re: approval items balloting at STU in FHIR R3
- Discussion Topics
- Baltimore agenda
- Value set governance
- Vocabulary precepts (with HTA)
- Normative/continuous balloting in FHIR
- CIMI followup
- SGB Communication Plan
- Large architectures coming in:
- Evaluate PSS process to potentially provide earlier visibility
- How should a product family-type project be documented and reviewed - is PSS enough?
- When it affects cross-organizational methodology, PFMGs need to have a review/say - potential precept
- Updates that we do to newer versions of FHIR that are also applicable to older versions
- Baltimore agenda
- Parking Lot
- Degree of documentation for STU vs. Normative resources
- Mapping coordination
- Add link to Confluence page from ARB page
- Review of project management life cycle spec to see if it talks about project and ballot scope
- Review of MG responses to SGB query on substantive change
- Need to make sure that SGB is accurately reflected in the GOM, and figure out what precepts should appear in the GOM
- Review Mission and Charter
- Drafting Shared Product Management Responsibilities
- Technical Alignments Between Product Families
- How groups are to interact with publishing, EST, Vocabulary, etc.
- Precept on bringing in large projects
- Vocabulary - review HTA material for precepts
- Precept for adding new tools (include that WGs with a specific mandate must be involved, such as EST, Publishing, Vocabulary, etc.) - was this covered by the tooling precept we created in New Orleans?
- BAM guidance on process for product adoption
- Create PRECEPTS that require that it be articulated in the standards how the value sets specified within the standards respond to changes in regulation, licensing, time, etc.- to do in April/before Cologne
- FHIR Product Director Position Description: we should 1) review further and draft feedback, then 2) map back the description to the role of FGB
- Ownership of content
- What precepts do we need to address PSS/profile approval processes of balloting and publishing potentially thousands of CIMI model?
Minutes
Meeting Outcomes
Actions
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2018 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved