2018-08-15 SGB Conference Call

back to Standards Governance Board main page

HL7 SGB Minutes Location: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/538465637		Date: 2018-08-15 Time: 10:00 AM Eastern
Facilitator	Paul/Lorraine	Note taker(s)	Anne

Attendee	Name
	Calvin Beebe
	Lorraine Constable, co-chair
	Russ Hamm
	Tony Julian
	Paul Knapp, co-chair
	Ewout Kramer
Regrets	Austin Kreisler
Regrets	Wayne Kubick
Regrets	Thom Kuhn
	Rik Smithies
Regrets	Sandy Stuart
Quorum: Chair + 4

Agenda

• Agenda review
• Approve Minutes of 2018-07-18_SGB_Conference_Call
• Action Items
  • Paul to contact Vocab/PA re: approval items balloting at STU in FHIR R3
    • Will then verify with Karen that the documentation on the FHIR R3 ballot STU approvals is sufficient
  • Paul to ask PH for clarification on the status of items taken out of tracker and then reconciled on spreadsheet/ask for a plan for addressing the issue
  • Paul to draft precept on artifact governance
  • Paul/Austin to draft survey regarding desire for model-driven approach where a RDAM sits at the top
  • Calvin to look for final report that came out of Structured Docs regarding maintaining value sets
  • Lorraine/Tony to follow up on RDAM minutes from last steering division call
  • Anne to dig up context for agenda item "Degree of documentation for STU vs. Normative resources"
    • Originally appeared on 2018-06-13 call as an item added to the agenda; my recollection is that it was added by Paul, but then we didn't get to it and it carried forward
• Discussion Topics
  • Recommendation from FMG to reappoint Brian Pech and Brian Postlethwaite to FMG
  • UTG/Vocabulary Governance
    • Determine questions for Ted
    • Vocabulary governance isn't currently under SGB. With UTG rollout, we need vocabulary precepts in place.
  • Continued discussion: Tasks in step 1 of the BAM
  • Normative/continuous balloting in FHIR - determine specific questions before discussing in Baltimore
  • SGB Communication Plan
  • Large architectures coming in:
    • Evaluate PSS process to potentially provide earlier visibility
    • How should a product family-type project be documented and reviewed - is PSS enough?
    • When it affects cross-organizational methodology, PFMGs need to have a review/say - potential precept
  • CIMI-MG followup
  • Updates that we do to newer versions of FHIR that are also applicable to older versions
• Parking Lot
  • Mapping coordination
    • Add link to Confluence page from ARB page
  • Review of project management life cycle spec to see if it talks about project and ballot scope
  • Review of MG responses to SGB query on substantive change
  • Need to make sure that SGB is accurately reflected in the GOM, and figure out what precepts should appear in the GOM
  • Review Mission and Charter
  • Drafting Shared Product Management Responsibilities
  • Technical Alignments Between Product Families
  • How groups are to interact with publishing, EST, Vocabulary, etc.
  • Precept on bringing in large projects
  • Vocabulary - review HTA material for precepts
  • Precept for adding new tools (include that WGs with a specific mandate must be involved, such as EST, Publishing, Vocabulary, etc.) - was this covered by the tooling precept we created in New Orleans?
  • BAM guidance on process for product adoption
  • Create PRECEPTS that require that it be articulated in the standards how the value sets specified within the standards respond to changes in regulation, licensing, time, etc.- to do in April/before Cologne
  • FHIR Product Director Position Description: we should 1) review further and draft feedback, then 2) map back the description to the role of FGB
  • Ownership of content
  • What precepts do we need to address PSS/profile approval processes of balloting and publishing potentially thousands of CIMI model?

Meeting Outcomes

Actions

Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items 2018-08-22 SGB Conference Call

© 2018 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved