This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "2017-10-13PC CIMI POC Call Minutes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | '''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | ||
| + | # Confirm semantic modeling assumptions for evaluation result | ||
| + | ## options | ||
| + | ### "assertion" pattern a la TermInfo | ||
| + | ### ignorable label (OE/LOINC, but result value is finding) | ||
| + | ### concept model composition: OE + qualifier = definition of finding | ||
| + | ## we don't have an answer yet; examples point both ways; we may need to support both | ||
# Plan | # Plan | ||
| − | + | ## deadline for SOLOR | |
| − | + | ## wound close to completion | |
| − | ## | + | ## skin assessment SME review not yet begun |
| − | #### | + | ## NPUAP amenable to using definitions; Susan to talk to Janet next week and find a time |
| − | ## | + | ## element definitions can go in CIMI archetypes, with attribution (see openEHR modeler tool) |
| − | ### | + | ### tangent: how to search for related models; how to distinguish related models (e.g., adoption, advocacy) |
| − | + | ## value set item definitions don't. Where? SOLOR extension descriptions? | |
| − | ## | + | ### issue: might definitions conflict with FSNs? |
| − | ### | + | # HSPC |
| − | # | + | ## meeting at 2 MT: wound assessment, common qualifiers, length & height, FHIR vs LOINC vitals panel |
| − | ## | + | # to do |
| − | + | ## Jay to dig up some use cases to test archetypes. | |
| − | # | + | ## include in ballot: Should complex items be codes or references? |
| − | ## | ||
| − | ## | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
===Meeting Outcomes=== | ===Meeting Outcomes=== | ||
Latest revision as of 16:19, 13 October 2017
Back to PC CIMI POC Minutes
Minutes Template
Meeting Information
| HL7 PC-CIMI-POC Meeting Minutes Location: Phone |
Date: 2017-10-13 Time: 11:00-12:00 ET | ||
| Facilitator | Jay Lyle | Note taker(s) | Jay Lyle |
| Attendee | Name | Affiliation
| |
| Richard Esmond | PenRad | ||
| Joey Coyle | JP Systems | ||
| y | Jay Lyle | JP Systems / VA | |
| y | Liz McCool | ||
| Angela Corvetti | |||
| y | Susan Matney | Intermountain | |
| y | Holly Miller | ||
| Gabriel Brat | Tissue Analytics | ||
| Rob McClure | |||
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- timeline for January.
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
- Confirm semantic modeling assumptions for evaluation result
- options
- "assertion" pattern a la TermInfo
- ignorable label (OE/LOINC, but result value is finding)
- concept model composition: OE + qualifier = definition of finding
- we don't have an answer yet; examples point both ways; we may need to support both
- options
- Plan
- deadline for SOLOR
- wound close to completion
- skin assessment SME review not yet begun
- NPUAP amenable to using definitions; Susan to talk to Janet next week and find a time
- element definitions can go in CIMI archetypes, with attribution (see openEHR modeler tool)
- tangent: how to search for related models; how to distinguish related models (e.g., adoption, advocacy)
- value set item definitions don't. Where? SOLOR extension descriptions?
- issue: might definitions conflict with FSNs?
- HSPC
- meeting at 2 MT: wound assessment, common qualifiers, length & height, FHIR vs LOINC vitals panel
- to do
- Jay to dig up some use cases to test archetypes.
- include in ballot: Should complex items be codes or references?
Meeting Outcomes
| Actions
|
| Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.
