This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Negation Requirements Project Minutes 5 July 2017"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with " <!-- LOOK FOR THE APPROPRIATE SECTION ****** TO ENTER INFORMATION--> Back to Negation Minutes ==Minutes== ===Meeting Information=== {|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspaci...") |
|||
Line 137: | Line 137: | ||
### distinguish classes from examples. | ### distinguish classes from examples. | ||
### distinguish "inferred" classes (e.g., "absence based on empty query result") from assertions | ### distinguish "inferred" classes (e.g., "absence based on empty query result") from assertions | ||
− | ### clarify | + | ### clarify these classes are statements, not states (epistemological, not ontological). E..g., the state of asplenia is semantically the same as the absence of spleen, but we hypothesize that the positive assertion of the condition supports most requirements, and we don't need to model absence explicitly. |
===Draft DAM=== | ===Draft DAM=== |
Revision as of 13:31, 6 July 2017
Back to Negation Minutes
Contents
Minutes
Meeting Information
HL7 PC-CIMI-POC Meeting Minutes Location: PC call line |
Date: 2017-07-05 Time: 11:00-12:00 ET | ||
Facilitator | Jay Lyle | Note taker(s) | Jay Lyle |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation
| |
y | Jay Lyle | JP Systems | |
y | Lisa Nelson | ||
y | Ken Lord | ||
Elaine Taylor | |||
John Roberts | |||
Zahid Butt | |||
Andrew Haslam | |||
Floyd Eisenberg | |||
Susan Barber | |||
y | Larry McKnight | ||
Galen Mulrooney | |||
Kurt Allen | |||
Jim Case | |||
Juliet Rubini | |||
Hank Mayers | |||
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- agenda review
- ballot overview:
- clarifications
- comments grouped in spreadsheet on wiki Biggest categories:
- editorial pass - Mark K has offered. But first, finish analysis.
- rationalize/harmonize terms (classes, categories)
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
- For clarity: put together an editorial plan so that contributors can participate in writing & revision
- Classifications
- Review of class diagram
- rationalize levels. E.g., "phenomena" have "present" and "absent," but "action" doesn't.
- distinguish classes from examples.
- distinguish "inferred" classes (e.g., "absence based on empty query result") from assertions
- clarify these classes are statements, not states (epistemological, not ontological). E..g., the state of asplenia is semantically the same as the absence of spleen, but we hypothesize that the positive assertion of the condition supports most requirements, and we don't need to model absence explicitly.
- Review of class diagram
Draft DAM
Meeting Outcomes
Actions
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.