This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "Negation Requirements Project Minutes 5 July 2017"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with " <!-- LOOK FOR THE APPROPRIATE SECTION ****** TO ENTER INFORMATION--> Back to Negation Minutes ==Minutes== ===Meeting Information=== {|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspaci...")
 
Line 137: Line 137:
 
### distinguish classes from examples.  
 
### distinguish classes from examples.  
 
### distinguish "inferred" classes (e.g., "absence based on empty query result") from assertions
 
### distinguish "inferred" classes (e.g., "absence based on empty query result") from assertions
### clarify root class is statement, not state (epistemological, not ontological)
+
### clarify these classes are statements, not states (epistemological, not ontological). E..g., the state of asplenia is semantically the same as the absence of spleen, but we hypothesize that the positive assertion of the condition supports most requirements, and we don't need to model absence explicitly.
  
 
===Draft DAM===
 
===Draft DAM===

Revision as of 13:31, 6 July 2017

Back to Negation Minutes

Minutes

Meeting Information

HL7 PC-CIMI-POC Meeting Minutes

Location: PC call line

Date: 2017-07-05
Time: 11:00-12:00 ET
Facilitator Jay Lyle Note taker(s) Jay Lyle
Attendee Name Affiliation


y Jay Lyle JP Systems
y Lisa Nelson
y Ken Lord
Elaine Taylor
John Roberts
Zahid Butt
Andrew Haslam
Floyd Eisenberg
Susan Barber
y Larry McKnight
Galen Mulrooney
Kurt Allen
Jim Case
Juliet Rubini
Hank Mayers

Agenda

Agenda Topics

  1. agenda review
  2. ballot overview:
    1. clarifications
    2. comments grouped in spreadsheet on wiki Biggest categories:
      1. editorial pass - Mark K has offered. But first, finish analysis.
      2. rationalize/harmonize terms (classes, categories)


Minutes

Minutes/Conclusions Reached:

  1. For clarity: put together an editorial plan so that contributors can participate in writing & revision
  2. Classifications
    1. Review of class diagram
      1. rationalize levels. E.g., "phenomena" have "present" and "absent," but "action" doesn't.
      2. distinguish classes from examples.
      3. distinguish "inferred" classes (e.g., "absence based on empty query result") from assertions
      4. clarify these classes are statements, not states (epistemological, not ontological). E..g., the state of asplenia is semantically the same as the absence of spleen, but we hypothesize that the positive assertion of the condition supports most requirements, and we don't need to model absence explicitly.

Draft DAM

Meeting Outcomes

Actions
  • review Use Cases for completeness, classification for accuracy (all)


Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
  • Continue review of requirements

© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.