This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "20170606 arb minutes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| width="10%" colspan="1" align="right"|'''Facilitator''' | | width="10%" colspan="1" align="right"|'''Facilitator''' | ||
− | | width="35%" colspan="1" align="left"|[[User:Ajulian | Julian, Tony]] | + | | width="35%" colspan="1" align="left"|[[User:Ajulian | Julian, Tony]] |
| width="10%" colspan="1" align="right"|'''Note taker(s)''' | | width="10%" colspan="1" align="right"|'''Note taker(s)''' | ||
− | | width="30%" colspan="1" align="left"|[[User:Ajulian | Julian, Tony]] | + | | width="30%" colspan="1" align="left"|[[User:Ajulian | Julian, Tony]] |
|- | |- | ||
| border="4" cellpadding="1" colspan="4" style="background:#f0f0f0;"| | | border="4" cellpadding="1" colspan="4" style="background:#f0f0f0;"| | ||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
|colspan="2"|'''Affiliation''' | |colspan="2"|'''Affiliation''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |X||Bond,Andy |
|colspan="2"|NEHTA | |colspan="2"|NEHTA | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |R||[[User:Lconstab |Constable, Lorraine]] |
|colspan="2"|Constable Consulting Inc. | |colspan="2"|Constable Consulting Inc. | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
|colspan="2"| AEGIS | |colspan="2"| AEGIS | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |X||[[User:Ajulian | Julian, Tony]] |
|colspan="2"|Mayo Clinic | |colspan="2"|Mayo Clinic | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |X||Knapp, Paul |
|colspan="2"| Pknapp Consulting | |colspan="2"| Pknapp Consulting | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |X||Kubick, Wayne |
|colspan="2"|HL7 CTO | |colspan="2"|HL7 CTO | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
|colspan="2"| ICode Solutions | |colspan="2"| ICode Solutions | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |X||[[User:Clynchmd | Lynch, Cecil]] |
|colspan="2"|Accenture | |colspan="2"|Accenture | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |R||Milosevic, Zoran |
|colspan="2"|Deontik Pty Ltd | |colspan="2"|Deontik Pty Ltd | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |X||[[User:Astechishin| Stechishin,Andy]] |
|colspan="2"|CANA Software and Service Ltd. | |colspan="2"|CANA Software and Service Ltd. | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |colspan="4" align="center"| | + | |colspan="4" align="center"|SGB |
|- | |- | ||
− | |.|| | + | |.|| Kreisler, Austin |
− | |colspan="2"| | + | |colspan="2"| Leidos |
|- | |- | ||
− | |.|| | + | |.||Hamm, Russ |
− | |colspan="2"| | + | |colspan="2"|IMO |
|- | |- | ||
|.|| | |.|| |
Revision as of 21:19, 6 June 2017
ARB - Meeting (Date in Title)
Agenda
- Call to order
- Roll Call
- Approval of Agenda and May 30, 2017 Minutes
- Management
- Governance
- Methodology
- Joint with SGB to discuss Interoperability Specification Matrix (ISM)
- Other business and planning
- June 13 Continue Ballot Recon
- June 20 Review Mission and Charter
- Open issues
- Adjournment
Meeting Information
HL7 ARB Work Group Meeting Minutes Location: Telcon |
Date: 20160606 Time: 4:00pm U.S. Eastern | |||
Facilitator | Julian, Tony | Note taker(s) | Julian, Tony | |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation | ||
X | Bond,Andy | NEHTA | ||
R | Constable, Lorraine | Constable Consulting Inc. | ||
. | Hyland, Mario | AEGIS | ||
X | Julian, Tony | Mayo Clinic | ||
X | Knapp, Paul | Pknapp Consulting | ||
X | Kubick, Wayne | HL7 CTO | ||
. | Loyd, Patrick | ICode Solutions | ||
X | Lynch, Cecil | Accenture | ||
R | Milosevic, Zoran | Deontik Pty Ltd | ||
X | Stechishin,Andy | CANA Software and Service Ltd. | ||
SGB | ||||
. | Kreisler, Austin | Leidos | ||
. | Hamm, Russ | IMO | ||
. | ||||
Legend | ||||
X | Present | |||
. | Absent | |||
R | Regrets | |||
Quorum Requirements (Co-chair + 3) Met: Yes |
- Approval of Agenda and May 30, 2017 Minutes
- Agenda approved by mutual consent
- Motion to approve the minuts(Andy S/ Austin)
- Vote 4-0-0
- Methodology
- Joint with SGB to discuss Interoperability Specification Matrix (ISM)
- Tony presented the ISM diagram
- Discussed task - Provide guidance to groups to map their artifacts to the ISM.
- Depends on the work: If oriented for family instead of line. Line interested in logical models, Family interested in implementation..
- Platform oriented see logical modeling as overhead with little value.
- Product line has an interest in logical consistency within the line.
- Across HL7 there is a higher order - of which Family/Lines don't concern themselves.
- FHIR model is an abstraction, and is not implementable. From the outside you see it as core to FHIR, in implementable view.
- Value depends on your perspective, e.g. FHIR, CDA, V2.
- SGB is interested in the cross product family consistency, working through product families.
- SGB is concerned with lines that need consistency.
- Don't see those as lines - good things to do in order to have lines.
- Looking at a domain, what is the binding conceptual foundation, so talked about together they wont create inconsistencies. CDA, FHIR see it as an inhibitor, decided by others.
- Target audience - Product Families? families articulate their material into the grid.
- Narrows the focus to immediate future.
- Helps to surface what is hard.
- Challenge is for domains - this is the issue they deal with, different product families across the domain. For a family the core interest is the implementation - technical platform has been chosen. You can grow the interest with e.g. FHIR which needs to work with other platforms. Need to reconcile a set of behaviors.
- If the logical model is FHIR, we will take out the platform bits, and just have the information elements.
- This group needs to map one and map it, but not FHIR.
- There was a CDA exercise to do that. (Keith Boone facilitated).
- Worked on PPT.
- Next week put into the grid - may find a home, add examples, friendlier names.
- Joint with SGB to discuss Interoperability Specification Matrix (ISM)
- Other business and planning
- June 13 Continue Ballot Recon
- June 20 Review Mission and Charter
- Open issues
- Tony will send to Anne, for SGB consumption.
- Schedule monthly
- Adjournment