This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "October 11, 2016 Security Conference Call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
JohnMoehrke (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
* Review PSS - Document Sharing | * Review PSS - Document Sharing | ||
** Motion to approve co-sponsorship - Glen/Kathleen - unanimous | ** Motion to approve co-sponsorship - Glen/Kathleen - unanimous | ||
| + | ** Security WKG is co-sponsor | ||
| + | ** Smart on FHIR comes with Apendix (Grahm) | ||
| + | ** Each member organization needs harmonization | ||
| + | ** As co-sponsor we can help harmonize which OATH will work | ||
| + | ** We are to provide landscape analysis of bridging concerns (Kathleen) | ||
| + | ** Security WKG role is to review all concerns of competing parties | ||
| + | * PSAF Ballot- Mike Davis | ||
| + | ** NTR | ||
| + | * Nov Harmonization Proposal Review Also, new ActReason for overriding need for consent - incompetency; 5 new Compartment codes; and technical corrections to SecurityObservationValue value set. Initial submissions due date Nov. 14 - Kathleen | ||
| + | **Need approval of initial submission | ||
| + | ** Due Nov 14th | ||
| + | ** Intially completed and submitted in July, but was pulled out to see if it is too granular | ||
| + | ** There are two codes for purpose of use, one is used for eHealth exchange. | ||
| + | ** Next step: to meet Friday Nov 14th | ||
| + | |||
* Review Vocabulary proposal from Kathleen | * Review Vocabulary proposal from Kathleen | ||
** Concern with expansion of PurposeOfUse | ** Concern with expansion of PurposeOfUse | ||
| Line 77: | Line 92: | ||
*** are they intended to be categories? ==> Categories | *** are they intended to be categories? ==> Categories | ||
** Mike recommends we schedule a specific meeting to go deeper. | ** Mike recommends we schedule a specific meeting to go deeper. | ||
| + | ** the Vetting of Vocab WKG is approved | ||
| + | ** Recommendation to make clinical Trial a parent rather than a lease for health care Biomedical research | ||
| + | ** Specific Branches should be specific (profiles) such as Cancer or inherited disease | ||
| + | ** Some patients prefer not to share all health care info for research | ||
| + | ** Comment: Mohammad: There is no clear semantics on what constitutes as research | ||
| + | ***Patient consent is not the only place where purpose of use is needed | ||
| + | ***Vocab having a hierarchy can help make it more granular | ||
| + | *** Some patients may opt out for example genetic research | ||
| + | **Comment Glen: This is Policy Level vs. Operational level | ||
| + | *** The consent created is to group different types of studies to different types of consent | ||
*** Action: Kathleen to schedule focused call | *** Action: Kathleen to schedule focused call | ||
** John indicates that we should look to propose new signature types from Kathleen comment on FHIR | ** John indicates that we should look to propose new signature types from Kathleen comment on FHIR | ||
* FHIR Security meeting will be held | * FHIR Security meeting will be held | ||
* Adjourned | * Adjourned | ||
Revision as of 16:41, 18 October 2016
Back to Security Work Group Main Page
Attendees
| x | Member Name | x | Member Name | x | Member Name | x | Member Name | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | John MoehrkeSecurity Co-chair | x | Kathleen ConnorSecurity Co-chair | . | Alexander Mense Security Co-chair | . | Trish WilliamsSecurity Co-chair | |||
| x | Mike Davis | x | Suzanne Gonzales-Webb | x | David Staggs | x | Mohammed Jafari | |||
| x | Glen Marshall, SRS | . | Beth Pumo | . | Ioana Singureanu | . | Rob Horn | |||
| x | Diana Proud-Madruga | . | Serafina Versaggi | . | Joe Lamy | . | Galen Mulrooney | |||
| . | Duane DeCouteau | . | Chris Clark | . | Johnathan Coleman | . | Aaron Seib | |||
| . | Ken Salyards | . | Christopher D Brown TX | . | Gary Dickinson | . | Dave Silver | |||
| x | Rick Grow | . | William Kinsley | . | Paul Knapp | . | Mayada Abdulmannan | |||
| . | Kamalini Vaidya | . | Bill Kleinebecker | x | Christopher Shawn | . | Grahame Grieve | |||
| . | Oliver Lawless | . | Ken Rubin | . | Paul Petronelli , Mobile Health | . | Russell McDonell |
Agenda DRAFT
- (2 min) Roll Call, Agenda Approval
- (5 min) Approve Security WG October 4, 2016 call minutes and Security WG September 13, 2016 Minutesif these are available.
- (10 min) PSS Document Sharing Approve our co-sponsorship with goal to show how security is applied to a broader workflow through specifics on AuditEvent use, and OAuth use. Secondary goal to create end-to-end security testing for connectathon.
- (15 min) PSAF Ballot v.next Mike to discuss anticipated updates in response to ballot comments and new development. Determine next ballot level and possible renaming to prep for NIB submission by 10-31.
- (15 min) Nov Harmonization Proposal Review Also, new ActReason for overriding need for consent - incompetency; 5 new Compartment codes; and technical corrections to SecurityObservationValue value set. Initial submissions due date Nov. 14 - Kathleen
- (5 min) PASS Audit Conceptual Model – Diana
- (5 min) FHIR AuditEvent and Provenance ballot comments & FHIR Security Call reminder - John
FHIR Security Ballot comment and CP review and FHIM modeling of PSAF - See agenda at FHIR Security Agenda
Minutes
- John Chaired
- approval of agenda - Kathleen/Suzanne - unanimous
- approval of minutes of 4th - Glen/Rick - unanimous
- not approving minutes from 13th as they are not done yet
- Review PSS - Document Sharing
- Motion to approve co-sponsorship - Glen/Kathleen - unanimous
- Security WKG is co-sponsor
- Smart on FHIR comes with Apendix (Grahm)
- Each member organization needs harmonization
- As co-sponsor we can help harmonize which OATH will work
- We are to provide landscape analysis of bridging concerns (Kathleen)
- Security WKG role is to review all concerns of competing parties
- PSAF Ballot- Mike Davis
- NTR
- Nov Harmonization Proposal Review Also, new ActReason for overriding need for consent - incompetency; 5 new Compartment codes; and technical corrections to SecurityObservationValue value set. Initial submissions due date Nov. 14 - Kathleen
- Need approval of initial submission
- Due Nov 14th
- Intially completed and submitted in July, but was pulled out to see if it is too granular
- There are two codes for purpose of use, one is used for eHealth exchange.
- Next step: to meet Friday Nov 14th
- Review Vocabulary proposal from Kathleen
- Concern with expansion of PurposeOfUse
- Are these values specific enough?
- are they intended to be categories? ==> Categories
- Mike recommends we schedule a specific meeting to go deeper.
- the Vetting of Vocab WKG is approved
- Recommendation to make clinical Trial a parent rather than a lease for health care Biomedical research
- Specific Branches should be specific (profiles) such as Cancer or inherited disease
- Some patients prefer not to share all health care info for research
- Comment: Mohammad: There is no clear semantics on what constitutes as research
- Patient consent is not the only place where purpose of use is needed
- Vocab having a hierarchy can help make it more granular
- Some patients may opt out for example genetic research
- Comment Glen: This is Policy Level vs. Operational level
- The consent created is to group different types of studies to different types of consent
- Action: Kathleen to schedule focused call
- John indicates that we should look to propose new signature types from Kathleen comment on FHIR
- Concern with expansion of PurposeOfUse
- FHIR Security meeting will be held
- Adjourned
