This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Datatypes R2 Issue 92"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I propose to change the wording to what it used to be in the version 2 standard, that I found to depict the story better: | I propose to change the wording to what it used to be in the version 2 standard, that I found to depict the story better: | ||
− | + | '''"...In short, the syntax is YYYY[MM[DD[HH[MM[SS[.U[U[U[U]]]]]]]]][+|-ZZ[zz]]" where digits can be omitted..."''' |
Revision as of 17:00, 7 May 2007
The current wording says: "...In short, the syntax is "YYYYMMDDHHMMSS.UUUU[+|-ZZzz]" where digits can be omitted..."
I propose to change the wording to what it used to be in the version 2 standard, that I found to depict the story better: "...In short, the syntax is YYYY[MM[DD[HH[MM[SS[.U[U[U[U]]]]]]]]][+|-ZZ[zz]]" where digits can be omitted..."