Difference between revisions of "June 7, 2016 Security Conference Call"
Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
==Minutes== | ==Minutes== | ||
+ | Chaired by John | ||
+ | |||
+ | -ApproveSecurity WG May 31, 2016 Minutes (deferred to next meeting) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | *Standards Privacy Impact Assessment Cookbook - Rick | ||
+ | -After reviewing PSS, the TSC requested edits to reflect that project is indeed a guide and does not intend to impose a new requirement on HL7. | ||
+ | Edited PSS to be shown to Security WG. CBCC voted to approve edited version on their 06/07/16 call. | ||
+ | -PSS Advanced to technical steering committee to HL7 for e-vote | ||
+ | -During the call they informed Rick they were concerned with the language in the scope section | ||
+ | -Concern it may impose a new requirement | ||
+ | -Rick edited with new language (using Encouraged in the scope) the section of concern so it can appear more of a Guide | ||
+ | -Clarified the out of scope section to CBCC that it is up to the individual implementer to determine how to deal with the Privacy aspects | ||
+ | -Provided CBCC with references on Privacy design work of OASIS Privacy design work, W3C, IETF, and ISO Privacy framework Standard |
Revision as of 18:41, 14 June 2016
Back to Security Work Group Main Page
Attendees
x | Member Name | x | Member Name | x | Member Name | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x | Kathleen ConnorSecurity Co-chair | . | Duane DeCouteau | . | Chris Clark | |||
X | John MoehrkeSecurity Co-chair | . | Johnathan Coleman | . | Aaron Seib | |||
x | Alexander Mense Security Co-chair | . | Ken Salyards | . | Christopher D Brown TX | |||
. | Trish WilliamsSecurity Co-chair | . | Gary Dickinson | x | Dave Silver | |||
x | Mike Davis | . | Ioana Singureanu | X | Mohammed Jafari | |||
x | Suzanne Gonzales-Webb | . | Rob Horn | . | Galen Mulrooney | |||
x | Diana Proud-Madruga | . | Ken Rubin | . | William Kinsley | |||
x | Rick Grow | . | Paul Knapp | x | Mayada Abdulmannan | |||
x | Glen Marshall, SRS | . | Bill Kleinebecker | x | Christopher Shawn | |||
. | Oliver Lawless | . | [mailto | . | Serafina Versaggi | |||
. | Beth Pumo | . | Russell McDonell | . | Paul Petronelli , Mobile Health | |||
. | Christopher Doss | . | Kamalini Vaidya | . | [mailto: TBD ] |
Agenda DRAFT
- (2 min) Roll Call, Agenda Approval
- (3 min) ApproveSecurity WG May 31, 2016 Minutes
- (20 min) FHIR Test Scripts Discussion with Aegis - Mario Hyland et al. Background: At WGM Gary invited Security to attend an EHR WG session to discuss approaches for encouraging uptake of Privacy, Security - especially Audit, Lifecycle Provenance, Trust FHIR infrastructure among FHIR Connectathon participants and implementers generally. This is a follow up discussion on previous approaches [Gary's tracks added Connectathon achievement points] and Lloyd's suggestion that passing test scripts could be tied in some way to Connectathon participation.
- (20 min) Update on the PSAF Security Policy model - Mike
- (10 min) Standards Privacy Impact Assessment Cookbook - Rick
- After reviewing PSS, the TSC requested edits to reflect that project is indeed a guide and does not intend to impose a new requirement on HL7.
- Edited PSS to be shown to Security WG. CBCC voted to approve edited version on their 06/07/16 call.
- (3 min) PASS Access Control Services Conceptual Model - Diana
- (3 min) PASS Audit Conceptual Model – Diana
- (2 min) Action Items, next call agenda, adjornment
Note that there will be a FHIR Security call at 2pm PT/5pm ET See agenda at FHIR Security Agenda
Minutes
Chaired by John
-ApproveSecurity WG May 31, 2016 Minutes (deferred to next meeting)
- Standards Privacy Impact Assessment Cookbook - Rick
-After reviewing PSS, the TSC requested edits to reflect that project is indeed a guide and does not intend to impose a new requirement on HL7. Edited PSS to be shown to Security WG. CBCC voted to approve edited version on their 06/07/16 call. -PSS Advanced to technical steering committee to HL7 for e-vote -During the call they informed Rick they were concerned with the language in the scope section -Concern it may impose a new requirement -Rick edited with new language (using Encouraged in the scope) the section of concern so it can appear more of a Guide -Clarified the out of scope section to CBCC that it is up to the individual implementer to determine how to deal with the Privacy aspects -Provided CBCC with references on Privacy design work of OASIS Privacy design work, W3C, IETF, and ISO Privacy framework Standard