This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "ITS SIG open action items"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Charliemccay (talk | contribs) |
Charliemccay (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
*2006-11-13 - New. Grahame to contact HQ and see if there is an ANSI-defined status that conveys a level of correctness and support to implementers, but that stops short of "normative" and all of the burden that comes with it. If none exist, will propose a new status (e.g., "HL7 Sanctioned"). Related to [[Normative XML ITS Schema]] INM Workitem. | *2006-11-13 - New. Grahame to contact HQ and see if there is an ANSI-defined status that conveys a level of correctness and support to implementers, but that stops short of "normative" and all of the burden that comes with it. If none exist, will propose a new status (e.g., "HL7 Sanctioned"). Related to [[Normative XML ITS Schema]] INM Workitem. | ||
*20070110 - Still waiting for response - To chase up and transfer this item to ITS Sig | *20070110 - Still waiting for response - To chase up and transfer this item to ITS Sig | ||
| + | == ITEM ITS001 == | ||
| + | *20070326 request sent to Mike Kingery by Charlie McCay | ||
| + | Please could the XML SIG be renamed the ITS SIG in the concalls application -- it may start to confuse folk that do not have long memories | ||
Revision as of 16:03, 26 March 2007
Item: 1091
Opened 20060511
reference to WS-Addressing in the profile needs to updated.
- 20060511: San Antonio WGM: From joint InM/XML minutes Thursday Q1.
- WS-Addressing is not [sic] a W3C specification (done). The Web services profile can now point to a full specification not a draft.
- The reference to WS-Addressing in the profile needs to updated. (Roberto, and to review that we are conformant with the final version).
- 20060911: Larson: This is not on the Wiki. Has this been done? Is it still active?
- 20060913: Larson: Late entry to Wiki based on InM minutes from San Antonio WGM; Roberto R; W3C
- 20060913: Charlie will speak to Roberto
- 20070326: Charlie sent email to Roberto
- 20070326: Charlie - moved to ITS SIG action items as ITS SIG responsible for specification
Item: 1107
Clarify with MnM how you refer to model artifacts within the XML ITS, XML ITS
- Charlie McCay to clarify with MnM how you refer to model artifacts within the XML ITS. (Mark suggests to write a document and propose it to MnM.)
- 20060914: Opened
- 20061002: Telcon still open
- 2006-11-13 Open
- 20070110: Still a good idea. To be transferred to ITS Sig
- 20070326: Charlie created as an ITS SIG action -- suggest that it is closed here
ITEM 1118
Document gap between XML Schema and ITS Capabilities, XML
- 2006-11-13 - New. Grahame to detail those requirements of the XML and UML ITS' that cannot be represented by XML Schemas. Related to Normative XML ITS Schema INM Workitem.
- 20070110 - still undergoing further development. To be transferred to ITS Sig
- 20070326 - Charlie: added item to ITS SIG list -- suggest closed here
ITEM 1119
Propose an official status for XML schemas
- 2006-11-13 - New. Grahame to contact HQ and see if there is an ANSI-defined status that conveys a level of correctness and support to implementers, but that stops short of "normative" and all of the burden that comes with it. If none exist, will propose a new status (e.g., "HL7 Sanctioned"). Related to Normative XML ITS Schema INM Workitem.
- 20070110 - Still waiting for response - To chase up and transfer this item to ITS Sig
ITEM ITS001
- 20070326 request sent to Mike Kingery by Charlie McCay
Please could the XML SIG be renamed the ITS SIG in the concalls application -- it may start to confuse folk that do not have long memories
