|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | | + | See [[FHIR Workflow Minutes CC 20160418]] |
| − | [[Category:FHIR Workflow Minutes]] | |
| − | __NOTOC__
| |
| − | =FHIR Workflow Conference Call 3:00PM Eastern Time (Date above)=
| |
| − | [[:Category:FHIR Workflow Minutes|Return to FHIR Workflow Minutes]]
| |
| − | ==Agenda==
| |
| − | *Approve [[FHIR Workflow_Minutes_CC_20160411| Minutes Prior Meeting on 04/11]]
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Attendees==
| |
| − | *Lloyd McKenzie (chair/scribe)
| |
| − | *Andrea Pitkus
| |
| − | *Bryn Rhodes
| |
| − | *Gary Dickinson
| |
| − | *Hans Buitendijk
| |
| − | *John Hatem
| |
| − | *Karl Holzer
| |
| − | *Lee Surprenant
| |
| − | *Michelle Miller
| |
| − | *Miranda Hoang
| |
| − | *Oliver Krauss
| |
| − | *Scott Robertson
| |
| − | *Viet Nguyen
| |
| − | *Jose Costa Teixeira
| |
| − | *Rob Hausam (joined after minutes)
| |
| − | *Robert Dieterle
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Minutes==
| |
| − | Motion to approve minutes of Apr. 11: Hans/Andrea: 11-0-2
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Protocol discussion==
| |
| − | Lloyd and Bryn talked about their discussions re: integrating Protocol and OrderSet
| |
| − | * Plan is to broaden OrderSet to encompass what Protocol does
| |
| − | * Refine how OrderSet defines activities to reflect what Protocol does, but allowing dynamic behavior by defining value of an attribute by an expression
| |
| − | * Look at using DecisionSupportRule as being our "reuseable activity"
| |
| − | * We will want to have the capability to express computable or descriptive variability on individual elements - this will probably be done as extensions. WGs will decide what extensions they need, but should align those extensions with how the equivalent is done in the Protocol resource
| |
| − | ** These same computable & descriptive logic extensions would be relevant for use on orders as well where elements need to have dynamic/calculated values (e.g. dosage calculations, relative timings, etc.)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Composite Order==
| |
| − | * Bob D. and others will look to identify use cases they feel can't be solved without having a distinct record for a "parent" order in a composite scenario
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | ==Adjournment==
| |
Latest revision as of 18:03, 25 April 2016
