Mar 7th, Templates Minutes

Attendees:

Galen Mulrooney Grahame Grieve Ian Townend Mark Shafarman

Before the meeting Grahame sent out an email requesting a vote on two prepared motions to block-approve the dispositions on the A-T and A-Q ballot responses:

1. 1: to approve the dispositions for all the A-T line items, namely

  40,54,58,61,63,68,73,78,79,85,87,88,98,99,101,104,105,106,108
  IT seconded  3/0/0

1. 2: to approve the dispositions for all the A-Q line items, namely

   17,25,33,37,46,75,95,102
  IT seconded  3/0/0

Issue #2: Grahame moved Lloyd's comment be found non-persuasive, and that the following text will be inserted into the document per the discussion on the SPL mailing list: Under certain circumstances, when explicitly descirbed in the interface contract, applications are entitled to reject instances because unrecognized or unacceptable templates are associated with the instance, or if a template is not applied where it is expected

  IT seconded  3/0/0

Issue #11: Grahame moved Lloyd's comment be found non-persuasive, because while it may be true that registration is not required, but if a tool claims to provide conformance to the registration role, it's not unreasonable to make rules about registration.

  IT seconded  3/0/0

Issue #15: Grahame moved Lloyd's comment be found non-persuasive, because it is Ok to make rules for these roles - applications to not need to do these things

  MS seconded  3/0/0

Issue #26: Grahame moved that the comment be found non-persuasive, because we are in violent disagreement that the entry point can be any class in the template.

  IT seconded  3/0/0