Difference between revisions of "March 1, 2016 Security Conference Call"
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|| x|| [mailto:Suzanne.Webb@engilitycorp.com Suzanne Gonzales-Webb] | || x|| [mailto:Suzanne.Webb@engilitycorp.com Suzanne Gonzales-Webb] | ||
| − | |||| | + | ||||x|| [mailto:mailto:robert.horn@agfa.com Rob Horn] |
||||.|| [mailto:Galen.Mulrooney@JPSys.com Galen Mulrooney] | ||||.|| [mailto:Galen.Mulrooney@JPSys.com Galen Mulrooney] | ||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
|| x|| [mailto:rgrow@technatomy.com Rick Grow] | || x|| [mailto:rgrow@technatomy.com Rick Grow] | ||
||||.|| [mailto:pknapp@pknapp.com Paul Knapp] | ||||.|| [mailto:pknapp@pknapp.com Paul Knapp] | ||
| − | |||| | + | ||||x|| [mailto:Mayada.Abdulmannan@va.gov Mayada Abdulmannan] |
|- | |- | ||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
||||.|| [mailto:serafina.versaggi@gmail.com Serafina Versaggi ] | ||||.|| [mailto:serafina.versaggi@gmail.com Serafina Versaggi ] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | || | + | || X|| [mailto:Beth.Pumo@kp.org Beth Pumo] |
||||.|| [mailto:russell.mcdonell@c-cost.com Russell McDonell] | ||||.|| [mailto:russell.mcdonell@c-cost.com Russell McDonell] | ||
||||.|| [mailto:paul.petronelli@gmail.com Paul Petronelli ], Mobile Health | ||||.|| [mailto:paul.petronelli@gmail.com Paul Petronelli ], Mobile Health | ||
|- | |- | ||
|| .|| [mailto:cdoss@ncat.edu Christopher Doss] | || .|| [mailto:cdoss@ncat.edu Christopher Doss] | ||
| − | |||| | + | ||||X|| [mailto:kamalinivaidya@systemsmadesimple.com Kamalini Vaidya] |
||||.|| [mailto: Stephanie Dyke ] | ||||.|| [mailto: Stephanie Dyke ] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
= Minutes = | = Minutes = | ||
#Consensus approval of Feb 23 minutes | #Consensus approval of Feb 23 minutes | ||
| − | # | + | #Joint Vocabulary Alignment Discussion update: |
| − | # | + | -Continued work to refine approach to models |
| + | #PASS Audit Conceptual Model Discussion: - | ||
| + | Provenance is related to where records are obtained | ||
| + | Question Raised: "Does Audit create separate list for Provenance? " | ||
| + | Discussion/Answer: | ||
| + | -Audit creates a separate list for Provenance: The Life cycle of resource and life cycle of Order of obligation as different value sets. | ||
| + | -Audit Provenance Model provides information related to integrity and trustworthiness | ||
| + | -Value sets should be defined by structuring the document for the implementer, and should be mapped to existing standards. | ||
| + | -Next Step: Kathleen Connor will provide documentation on Provenance and Audit in the Groove space | ||
| + | #FHIR Security Report Out: (Rob Mclure) | ||
| + | -Issue Raised: FHIR SVCS uses IP bound code system SNOWMED. Is there a technology that can be promoted to FHIR that would allow value set authority Center SNOWMED, where a ticket is identified as "I am a licence User of SNOWMED?" Can a receiver and requester both be licensed? | ||
| + | -Discussion/Answer: | ||
| + | -Profile on OATH allows claims assertions | ||
| + | -Includes License and tickets | ||
| + | -next step: OATH maybe a possible solution, review the requirements and draft a project scope statement. | ||
Revision as of 18:00, 2 March 2016
Back to Security Work Group Main Page
Attendees
| x | Member Name | x | Member Name | x | Member Name | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | Kathleen ConnorSecurity Co-chair | . | Duane DeCouteau | . | Chris Clark | |||
| x | John MoehrkeSecurity Co-chair | . | Johnathan Coleman | . | Aaron Seib | |||
| . | Alexander Mense Security Co-chair | . | Ken Salyards | . | Christopher D Brown TX | |||
| . | Trish WilliamsSecurity Co-chair | . | Gary Dickinson | . | Dave Silver | |||
| x | Mike Davis | . | Ioana Singureanu | . | Mohammed Jafari | |||
| x | Suzanne Gonzales-Webb | x | Rob Horn | . | Galen Mulrooney | |||
| x | Diana Proud-Madruga | . | Ken Rubin | . | William Kinsley | |||
| x | Rick Grow | . | Paul Knapp | x | Mayada Abdulmannan | |||
| x | Glen Marshall, SRS | . | Bill Kleinebecker | x | Christopher Shawn | |||
| . | Oliver Lawless | . | ... | . | Serafina Versaggi | |||
| X | Beth Pumo | . | Russell McDonell | . | Paul Petronelli , Mobile Health | |||
| . | Christopher Doss | X | Kamalini Vaidya | . | [mailto: Stephanie Dyke ] |
Agenda DRAFT
- ( 5 min) Roll Call, Agenda Approval
- ( 5 min) Approve February 23, 2016 Security WG Conference Call Minutes
- ( 5 min) PASS Access Control Services Conceptual Model - Diana
- ( 5 min) Joint Vocabulary Alignment Update - Diana
- ( 5 min) PASS Audit Conceptual Model – Diana
- ( 5 min) FHIR Security report out - John
Note that there will be a FHIR Security call at 2pm PT/5pm ET See agenda at FHIR Security Agenda
Minutes
- Consensus approval of Feb 23 minutes
- Joint Vocabulary Alignment Discussion update:
-Continued work to refine approach to models
- PASS Audit Conceptual Model Discussion: -
Provenance is related to where records are obtained Question Raised: "Does Audit create separate list for Provenance? " Discussion/Answer: -Audit creates a separate list for Provenance: The Life cycle of resource and life cycle of Order of obligation as different value sets. -Audit Provenance Model provides information related to integrity and trustworthiness -Value sets should be defined by structuring the document for the implementer, and should be mapped to existing standards. -Next Step: Kathleen Connor will provide documentation on Provenance and Audit in the Groove space
- FHIR Security Report Out: (Rob Mclure)
-Issue Raised: FHIR SVCS uses IP bound code system SNOWMED. Is there a technology that can be promoted to FHIR that would allow value set authority Center SNOWMED, where a ticket is identified as "I am a licence User of SNOWMED?" Can a receiver and requester both be licensed? -Discussion/Answer: -Profile on OATH allows claims assertions -Includes License and tickets -next step: OATH maybe a possible solution, review the requirements and draft a project scope statement.
