Revision as of 08:09, 10 February 2016

Health Concern Topic

Patient Care WG

February 9nd 2016

Participation Information Phone Number: +1 770-657-9270 Participant Passcode: 943377

Web Meeting Info www.webex.com Meeting number 238 558 505

Jay could not be present, but has sent a proposal for the new model in which the concern list and health concern events were adapted according to the motions of February 2nd.

Discussion arises whether the SOAP boxes should be grayed out to express that they are not in scope of the DAM.
The annotation in the green box actually is clear enough.
Motion to discard the SOAP boxes ( Subjective, Objective, Judgement, Intervention) and keep the annotation in the green box.
Motion moved by Dan, second by David Tao: 0 abstentions, 0 against, 5 in favour.

Dan raises the issue that the model does not convey the relationship between health concern and health concern event properly.
It does not seem to represent the model that Larry Weed has documented in his POMR article.
How does the health concern acquire it's name? The health concern itself does not seem to contain the content of the health concern.
The health concern originates from a health concern event. This could be an diagnosis, a finding or even an observation where a care providers expresses his concern and tags the event to a health concern.
The name of the health concern is derived from this event and copied into the local name of the health concern class.
Eventually the care provider might reconsider the name of the health concern and override it with newer insight extracted from a new finding.

Propose text about priorities between health concerns: David
Submit the NIB: Michael
Change allergy and problem lists to concern lists: jay
Proposal for alternative model diagram with SOAP elements related to the health concern: Jay.

Go back to health concern minutes[[1]]

@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 * Motion to discard the SOAP boxes ( Subjective, Objective, Judgement, Intervention) and keep the annotation in the green box.
 * Motion moved by Dan, second by David Tao: 0 abstentions, 0 against, 5 in favour.
+* Dan raises the issue that the model does not convey the relationship between health concern and health concern event properly.
+* It does not seem to represent the model that Larry Weed has documented in his POMR article.
+* How does the health concern acquire it's name? The health concern itself does not seem to contain the content of the health concern.
+* The health concern originates from a health concern event. This could be an diagnosis, a finding or even an observation where a care providers expresses his concern and tags the event to a health concern.
+* The name of the health concern is derived from this event and copied into the local name of the health concern class.
+* Eventually the care provider might reconsider the name of the health concern and override it with newer insight extracted from a new finding.
 == Action items==